Q: Not a question, just my thoughts.
I understand the need for people to question companies business practices etc. but I think that there should be (monetary) repercussions to the SHORT REPORT authors if they have no facts to prove their thesis. Seems that when a report comes out making accusations of fraud, the affected business is deemed guilty until it can prove it's innocence. Meanwhile, the short seller walks away laughing with a pile of money. Individuals have rights if they are personally attacked and have legal recourse when they are slandered. Why are businesses treated differently?
Comments?
I understand the need for people to question companies business practices etc. but I think that there should be (monetary) repercussions to the SHORT REPORT authors if they have no facts to prove their thesis. Seems that when a report comes out making accusations of fraud, the affected business is deemed guilty until it can prove it's innocence. Meanwhile, the short seller walks away laughing with a pile of money. Individuals have rights if they are personally attacked and have legal recourse when they are slandered. Why are businesses treated differently?
Comments?