-
PayPal Holdings Inc. (PYPL $61.12)
- $61.12 P/E (TTM): 12.53X Cap: $58.27B
- View PYPL Profile
- View Questions on PYPL
Detailed Quote
Questions on this company?
Become a Member
Company Profile
{tplLang.businessdescription | toLang tLang}
{ profileData.description }
{tplLang.details | toLang tLang}
{tplLang.ceo | toLang tLang}
{profileData.profile.details.ceo}
{tplLang.employees | toLang tLang}
{profileData.profile.details.employees | numeraljs '0,0'}
{tplLang.issuetype | toLang tLang}
{profileData.profile.details.issuetype | asIssueType}
{tplLang.industryclassifications | toLang tLang}
{tplLang.sector | toLang tLang}
{profileData.profile.classification.sector}
{tplLang.industry | toLang tLang}
{profileData.profile.classification.industry}
{tplLang.toolname| toLang tLang}
There is no {tplLang.toolname| toLang tLang} currently available for
{data.symbolstring}.
Interactive Chart
Key Ratios
Earnings
Analyst Recommendations
5i Recent Questions
-
PayPal Holdings Inc. (PYPL $61.12)
- $61.12 P/E (TTM): 12.53X Cap: $58.27B
- View PYPL Profile
- View Questions on PYPL
Q: Paypal. Sell or Hold. I can use a writeoff, moreover, would like to Get better return. Your advice, always precious.
Thank you
Thank you
-
PayPal Holdings Inc. (PYPL $61.12)
- $61.12 P/E (TTM): 12.53X Cap: $58.27B
- View PYPL Profile
- View Questions on PYPL
Q: What do you not like about PYPL?
Would YOU buy it considering low PE ratio and future growth prospects?
Would YOU buy it considering low PE ratio and future growth prospects?
-
PayPal Holdings Inc. (PYPL $61.12)
- $61.12 P/E (TTM): 12.53X Cap: $58.27B
- View PYPL Profile
- View Questions on PYPL
-
JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM $315.21)
- $315.21 P/E (TTM): 15.6X Cap: $857.62B
- View JPM Profile
- View Questions on JPM
-
Galaxy Digital Inc. Class A common stock (GLXY $36.15)
- $36.15 Cap: $13.77B
- View GLXY Profile
- View Questions on GLXY
- View Reports on GLXY
-
Fidelity Advantage Ether ETF (FETH $57.93)
- $57.93 Cap: $80M
- View FETH Profile
- View Questions on FETH
-
Circle Internet Group Inc. Class A (CRCL $83.96)
- $83.96 Cap: $20.16B
- View CRCL Profile
- View Questions on CRCL
Q: Hi. I've built positions across the digital asset and payments ecosystem that I'd appreciate your perspective on. My current holdings include: direct Bitcoin ownership (DCA monthly for store of value), FETH (smart contract infrastructure exposure), GLXY (institutional crypto services plus AI compute optionality), and PYPL (established fintech playing multiple angles; PYUSD stablecoin, BNPL, crypto trading, traditional payments, and I use PYPL quite a lot myself). I do also own JPM.
I'm considering adding CRCL but struggling with the valuation at 79x forward earnings (although it is 31x 2 years forward). My thesis is that I already capture stablecoin growth multiple ways; FETH captures a lot of stablecoin volume, GLXY services institutional stablecoin users, and PYPL's PYUSD gives me direct issuer exposure with less regulatory risk since they have diversified revenue streams.
CRCL feels like paying growth multiples for what I think might become a "utility-like" business earning regulated fees. Also, if stablecoins become critical infrastructure the regulatory hammer could fall hardest on pure-play issuers like Circle versus diversified players.
I think my current portfolio seems to cover the bases; Bitcoin for macro crypto adoption, Ethereum for DeFi/Web3 infrastructure, GLXY for the picks-and-shovels institutional play, and PYPL for the mainstream fintech integration angle (+ maybe JPM).
Am I missing something by passing on CRCL? I'm interested your thoughts on whether CRCL offers unique exposure I'm not getting elsewhere? Or if there is something I am overlooking?
I'm considering adding CRCL but struggling with the valuation at 79x forward earnings (although it is 31x 2 years forward). My thesis is that I already capture stablecoin growth multiple ways; FETH captures a lot of stablecoin volume, GLXY services institutional stablecoin users, and PYPL's PYUSD gives me direct issuer exposure with less regulatory risk since they have diversified revenue streams.
CRCL feels like paying growth multiples for what I think might become a "utility-like" business earning regulated fees. Also, if stablecoins become critical infrastructure the regulatory hammer could fall hardest on pure-play issuers like Circle versus diversified players.
I think my current portfolio seems to cover the bases; Bitcoin for macro crypto adoption, Ethereum for DeFi/Web3 infrastructure, GLXY for the picks-and-shovels institutional play, and PYPL for the mainstream fintech integration angle (+ maybe JPM).
Am I missing something by passing on CRCL? I'm interested your thoughts on whether CRCL offers unique exposure I'm not getting elsewhere? Or if there is something I am overlooking?
Insiders
Share Information
SEC Filings
News and Media