Q: Would ZWU or ZUT be a better hold for 2019 and beyond?
You can view 3 more answers this month. Sign up for a free trial for unlimited access.
Investment Q&A
Not investment advice or solicitation to buy/sell securities. Do your own due diligence and/or consult an advisor.
Q: For a 3 year hold,would you consider this a good stock to purchase?If yes,buy today or wait for the next quarterly report to see how the consolidation of their takeover is progressing?
Q: I hold Ratheon and Honeywell. Would you recommend selling these for a new holding in Boeing?
-
Canadian National Railway Company (CNR)
-
Canadian Pacific Kansas City Limited (CP)
-
TFI International Inc. (TFII)
Q: What is your preferred holding in this sector? I currently hold CNR.
Q: Hi peter and team!
Please give me advice from which websites you most like to read the news about Canadian and American companies and stocks?
Which are the most reliable and quickest to inform? What sites brokers are looking in the morning as soon as they get to work?
Thank you!
Please give me advice from which websites you most like to read the news about Canadian and American companies and stocks?
Which are the most reliable and quickest to inform? What sites brokers are looking in the morning as soon as they get to work?
Thank you!
Q: Hello, Happy New Year! Does the sector balancing tool un the etf and mutual fund update work only on excel? Is there a way to make it work on google sheets..Thank you. Shyam
Q: In your recent report on NFI you were scratching your head at the price decline. That was at $38.00, today it is at $33.00. If your assessment of the company is unchanged would you deploy new money to buy or would you wait for better momentum? If the latter what factors would suggest time to buy?
Thanks
Mike
Thanks
Mike
Q: With TOS now at 0.36$, do you see a big upside potential and if so, is it worth the risk ?
Thanks
Thanks
Q: THESE ARE HIGH DIVIDEND PAYING STOCKS.WHICH 5 ARE SAFEST ONE TO BUY AT THI TIME
ALA 16% MLPX 6 %
AMLP 9% POW 6 %
CFX 12% QCOM 5%
FN 9% QQQX 8%
GOV 25% RDS.A 5%
MFT 6% VET 8%
THANK YOU
EBRAHIM
ALA 16% MLPX 6 %
AMLP 9% POW 6 %
CFX 12% QCOM 5%
FN 9% QQQX 8%
GOV 25% RDS.A 5%
MFT 6% VET 8%
THANK YOU
EBRAHIM
Q: If you had to choose between these - which one would you choose and why?
Q: KBLT has been weak recently, even after the end of tax-loss selling. On Tuesday, they announced the friendly acquisition of the shares of Highlands Pacific that they do not already own. Could you comment on this transaction and the impact on KBLT?
Q: My daughter’s Investment acct and TFSA are reasonably balanced. TFSA holdings and returns are below. TFSA value is $88,247.
Stock Value Return Portfolio
Percentage
Bank of NS 11,228 5.83% 2.43%
Dollarama 9,741 -37.44% 2.11%
Element Capital 9,660 -9.56% 2.09%
Knight Therapau 12,304 -3.93% 2.67%
Parkland 14,136 119.37% 3.06%
Transcontinental 5,790 -39.08% 1.26%
Savaria 13,060 68.90% 2.83%
Spin Master 11,517 1.09% 2.50%
I’m thinking of splitting the 2019 $6000 contribution between TCL.A and SIS. Second choice is add a new stock such as CAE. Any thoughts? Many thanks.
Stock Value Return Portfolio
Percentage
Bank of NS 11,228 5.83% 2.43%
Dollarama 9,741 -37.44% 2.11%
Element Capital 9,660 -9.56% 2.09%
Knight Therapau 12,304 -3.93% 2.67%
Parkland 14,136 119.37% 3.06%
Transcontinental 5,790 -39.08% 1.26%
Savaria 13,060 68.90% 2.83%
Spin Master 11,517 1.09% 2.50%
I’m thinking of splitting the 2019 $6000 contribution between TCL.A and SIS. Second choice is add a new stock such as CAE. Any thoughts? Many thanks.
Q: I would like to add one railway holding to an already well-diversified portfolio .. given the recent news about CN's development of a bitumen "puck" as an alternative method for shipping crude, which of these two (CNR or CP) would you favour this month? Does this news have implications for pipelines?
Q: I am a new member to 5I Research.
Can you please review the beneficial tax implications of receiving dividends from Canadian companies vs companies outside of Canada?
With this in mind, what would be 10 top dividend paying Canadian companies you would recommend for a tax efficient retirement income?
Thanks and I look forward to your reply.
Can you please review the beneficial tax implications of receiving dividends from Canadian companies vs companies outside of Canada?
With this in mind, what would be 10 top dividend paying Canadian companies you would recommend for a tax efficient retirement income?
Thanks and I look forward to your reply.
-
Dollarama Inc. (DOL)
-
CCL Industries Inc. Unlimited Class B Non-Voting Shares (CCL.B)
-
Kinaxis Inc. (KXS)
-
Premium Brands Holdings Corporation (PBH)
-
Savaria Corporation (SIS)
-
goeasy Ltd. (GSY)
Q: I currently hold small positions on the following. Based on current valuations and growth expectations, which Companies would you add to? in order of preference,
Thanks Valter
Thanks Valter
Q: I have a few "balance" portfolio positions in my trade account that I am wondering about transferring to my TFSA. From 5iR answers, I take it growth is one factor to consider for possible positions for a TFSA and also a preference for less cyclical business companies.
MX is a dominant primary supplier but might be like a little cyclical what with seasonal demand by customers.
Then there is TFII that is growing through acquisitions but is tied to the general economy which is cyclical in nature.
Also, NFI has to business segments, buses and RV, and good backlog but is volume of business depends on municipal funding for transportation vehicles and then for RV, the "wealth" of folks...both segments have volume variability over time.
For growth, there is VB, although a smaller company relative to the other three.
With this, would you consider these good TFSA candidates? And if so, what order would you rank them, like first to last?........Thanks.....Tom
MX is a dominant primary supplier but might be like a little cyclical what with seasonal demand by customers.
Then there is TFII that is growing through acquisitions but is tied to the general economy which is cyclical in nature.
Also, NFI has to business segments, buses and RV, and good backlog but is volume of business depends on municipal funding for transportation vehicles and then for RV, the "wealth" of folks...both segments have volume variability over time.
For growth, there is VB, although a smaller company relative to the other three.
With this, would you consider these good TFSA candidates? And if so, what order would you rank them, like first to last?........Thanks.....Tom
Q: I hold ENB and recently read that the state of Minnesota has appealed the approval of ENB's line 3. What are your thoughts on this ? Is the appeal likely to be successful? I am thinking that if the appeal was successful that the impact to ENB stock would be huge.
Ken
Ken
-
Pembina Pipeline Corporation (PPL)
-
Thomson Reuters Corporation (TRI)
-
goeasy Ltd. (GSY)
-
Brookfield Infrastructure Partners L.P. (BIP.UN)
Q: Do you have any dividend yield plays with this market correction,that a person could take advantage of? I prefer a yield with some growth,kind of looking at ENB,IPL,AQN. I currently have BNS,some preferred,debentures,etc. I would appreciate any suggestions you might have.
Q: Emerging companies in the Marijuana industry like these two need focus to progress in a positive way. What are your top 3-5 areas of attention that you would like to see and continue to research to make them a worthwhile investment opportunity in 2019 and beyond?
-
iShares Core S&P/TSX Capped Composite Index ETF (XIC)
-
iShares S&P/TSX Canadian Dividend Aristocrats Index ETF (CDZ)
-
CI Canada Quality Dividend Growth Index ETF (DGRC)
Q: Two questions on Canadian equity/dividend ETFs:
1) The holdings in DGRC are selected based on market cap, expected earnings growth, return on equity, and return on assets. How is it that none of the Big 5 Canadian banks qualify for inclusion in their portfolio? This is puzzling to me. What is your opinion of this ETF for the core Canadian equity component of one's portfolio, for a longterm hold?
2) You continue to recommend XIC despite reminding members, many a time, of how the TSX index is heavily concentrated in financials and energy. Why? It is a cheap ETF, but other CDN equity ETFs (like DGRC) are modestly more expensive but I can't help but think that the few extra basis points in cost are worth it if it allows for a more balanced sector allocation overall. You continue to recommend CDZ even though it is very expensive, with a MER of 0.66. Why? I know it is analogous to VGG/VIG, which you (and I) love, but I don't think they're comparable, since VGG/VIG contains many companies with a much longer history of dividend increases (including many so-called 'Dividend Aristocrats' and 'Dividend Kings' whereas inclusion in CDZ only requires that a company has a history of increasing its dividend in at least four of the last five years. It almost seems like the continued recommendation of XIC and CDZ is due more to historical reasons rather than their merits as of right now, relative to other ETFs that may not have been available when XIC and CDZ were first made available.
1) The holdings in DGRC are selected based on market cap, expected earnings growth, return on equity, and return on assets. How is it that none of the Big 5 Canadian banks qualify for inclusion in their portfolio? This is puzzling to me. What is your opinion of this ETF for the core Canadian equity component of one's portfolio, for a longterm hold?
2) You continue to recommend XIC despite reminding members, many a time, of how the TSX index is heavily concentrated in financials and energy. Why? It is a cheap ETF, but other CDN equity ETFs (like DGRC) are modestly more expensive but I can't help but think that the few extra basis points in cost are worth it if it allows for a more balanced sector allocation overall. You continue to recommend CDZ even though it is very expensive, with a MER of 0.66. Why? I know it is analogous to VGG/VIG, which you (and I) love, but I don't think they're comparable, since VGG/VIG contains many companies with a much longer history of dividend increases (including many so-called 'Dividend Aristocrats' and 'Dividend Kings' whereas inclusion in CDZ only requires that a company has a history of increasing its dividend in at least four of the last five years. It almost seems like the continued recommendation of XIC and CDZ is due more to historical reasons rather than their merits as of right now, relative to other ETFs that may not have been available when XIC and CDZ were first made available.