Q: I've marked this question as private but if you feel the broader membership would possibly benefit from it - and more so, the answer, feel free to post it as a public question.
We have one kid who has just finished their first semester of university and a second one who is expected to enter their first year next September (2024). We have a decent sized family RESP consisting of 39% CASH.TO, 35% XWD, 14% HEQT, 7% XBAL, 3% KXS and 2% in cash.
I know portfolio weightings are personal but I'd like your take on maybe dialing back the potential risk of the current holdings, given both kids are/will be in university within the next nine months and the relatively short overall timeframe (4-5 years) the funds will be used in.
I came across an interesting article by Justin Bender on the Canadian Portfolio Manager Blog from Jan 2023, looking at an RESP "glide path strategy" based on the age of the kids that recommends by the time a kid started university that - to err on the side of safety and capital preservation - equity exposure should be 0%, with the RESP funds divided between short term bonds (ETF's) and cash equivalents (HISA ETF's) on a sliding scale of 75%/25% bonds/cash equiv year one of school, 67%/33% year 2, 50%/50% year 3 and 100% cash equivalents by the time they're starting their fourth year.
Can I get your opinion on this particular glide path strategy and if you agree with it or if you would do things differently? If you'd do things differently, what would you suggest as an alternative strategy?
Many thanks for your insight and perspective and all the best for a very Merry Christmas.
We have one kid who has just finished their first semester of university and a second one who is expected to enter their first year next September (2024). We have a decent sized family RESP consisting of 39% CASH.TO, 35% XWD, 14% HEQT, 7% XBAL, 3% KXS and 2% in cash.
I know portfolio weightings are personal but I'd like your take on maybe dialing back the potential risk of the current holdings, given both kids are/will be in university within the next nine months and the relatively short overall timeframe (4-5 years) the funds will be used in.
I came across an interesting article by Justin Bender on the Canadian Portfolio Manager Blog from Jan 2023, looking at an RESP "glide path strategy" based on the age of the kids that recommends by the time a kid started university that - to err on the side of safety and capital preservation - equity exposure should be 0%, with the RESP funds divided between short term bonds (ETF's) and cash equivalents (HISA ETF's) on a sliding scale of 75%/25% bonds/cash equiv year one of school, 67%/33% year 2, 50%/50% year 3 and 100% cash equivalents by the time they're starting their fourth year.
Can I get your opinion on this particular glide path strategy and if you agree with it or if you would do things differently? If you'd do things differently, what would you suggest as an alternative strategy?
Many thanks for your insight and perspective and all the best for a very Merry Christmas.