Q: Hi 5i,
Just a follow up on the first part of my previous ALA question. Thank you for your response to it. I understand that according to the release you quoted, any receipt reimbursement necessary would be "plus any unpaid Dividend Equivalent Payments owing to such holders of Subscription Receipts (the "Termination Payment")." What I had in mind was the part about the reimbursement being 'in full' unless there were insufficient funds available in the cash pool for paying the reimbursement. What I was thinking was that the dividend equivalent payments issued to receipt-holders are likely being drawn from that same cash pool, so a shortfall relative to 'in full' reimbursement might be reasonably foreseeable. The unused pool may well be invested in short term instruments in the meantime but I wouldn't think that could fully offset the 6.77% yield of the receipts (on the $31 issue price). Thanks again!
Just a follow up on the first part of my previous ALA question. Thank you for your response to it. I understand that according to the release you quoted, any receipt reimbursement necessary would be "plus any unpaid Dividend Equivalent Payments owing to such holders of Subscription Receipts (the "Termination Payment")." What I had in mind was the part about the reimbursement being 'in full' unless there were insufficient funds available in the cash pool for paying the reimbursement. What I was thinking was that the dividend equivalent payments issued to receipt-holders are likely being drawn from that same cash pool, so a shortfall relative to 'in full' reimbursement might be reasonably foreseeable. The unused pool may well be invested in short term instruments in the meantime but I wouldn't think that could fully offset the 6.77% yield of the receipts (on the $31 issue price). Thanks again!