Q: Greetings 5i,
I would like to ask your advice regarding my exposure to the Brookfield group of companies.
I currently own both BAM.A and BEP.UN (each at roughly a 3% weighting). I am aware that BEP offers a significantly higher yield, and realize that renewable energy is almost certainly the long-term future of the sector. However, given BAM's "parent company" status over BEP, as well as it's obvious diversification advantage (I consider BAM to be among the best long-term investments on the TSX), I am not sure that holding both is necessary for my overall goals.
My Canadian utilities exposure also includes a full position in FTS.
I am 36 years old, debt-free, conservative, and greatly prefer long-term holds that do not require constant monitoring. I am also making a effort to simplify my portfolio, and am not adverse to slightly reducing my number of overall holdings (currently at 34). My investment portfolio is strictly for the purpose of expediting my retirement, and I have no need of its funds for the foreseeable future.
Given my goals, do you feel as if my current Brookfield exposure is appropriate, or would a consolidated, 5% position in BAM (5% is generally my limit for a single holding) be more conducive with my long-term strategy?
Thank you.
I would like to ask your advice regarding my exposure to the Brookfield group of companies.
I currently own both BAM.A and BEP.UN (each at roughly a 3% weighting). I am aware that BEP offers a significantly higher yield, and realize that renewable energy is almost certainly the long-term future of the sector. However, given BAM's "parent company" status over BEP, as well as it's obvious diversification advantage (I consider BAM to be among the best long-term investments on the TSX), I am not sure that holding both is necessary for my overall goals.
My Canadian utilities exposure also includes a full position in FTS.
I am 36 years old, debt-free, conservative, and greatly prefer long-term holds that do not require constant monitoring. I am also making a effort to simplify my portfolio, and am not adverse to slightly reducing my number of overall holdings (currently at 34). My investment portfolio is strictly for the purpose of expediting my retirement, and I have no need of its funds for the foreseeable future.
Given my goals, do you feel as if my current Brookfield exposure is appropriate, or would a consolidated, 5% position in BAM (5% is generally my limit for a single holding) be more conducive with my long-term strategy?
Thank you.