Q: Greetings 5i,
I am making a effort to simplify my portfolio, and would like your advice on my current REIT exposure. Specifically, I currently hold REI.UN and CSH.UN at roughly 4% each, and am unsure whether both are necessary for my long-term strategy. REI is attractive to me based on its ownership of some of Canada's most important retail properties, its intention to diversify into residential holdings, and its excellent yield. CSH is held due to the nature of its business within an aging population, as well its stability in what I consider to be a relatively weak Canadian health care sector (my other healthcare exposure consists of UNH and JNJ). The income potential offered by holding both is nice, but, as a relatively young investor with a longer time-frame, I feel as if the funds from one might be better utilized on something with a slightly higher growth potential.
I am 36 years old, debt-free, conservative (although not totally adverse to risk), and greatly prefer long-term holds that do not require constant monitoring. My investment portfolio is strictly for the purpose of expediting my retirement, and I have no need of its funds for the foreseeable future.
Do you feel as if continuing to hold both would be beneficial, or would you recommend that I let one go and redeploy the capital elsewhere? If the later, which would you recommend I keep as a long term-hold?
Thank you.
I am making a effort to simplify my portfolio, and would like your advice on my current REIT exposure. Specifically, I currently hold REI.UN and CSH.UN at roughly 4% each, and am unsure whether both are necessary for my long-term strategy. REI is attractive to me based on its ownership of some of Canada's most important retail properties, its intention to diversify into residential holdings, and its excellent yield. CSH is held due to the nature of its business within an aging population, as well its stability in what I consider to be a relatively weak Canadian health care sector (my other healthcare exposure consists of UNH and JNJ). The income potential offered by holding both is nice, but, as a relatively young investor with a longer time-frame, I feel as if the funds from one might be better utilized on something with a slightly higher growth potential.
I am 36 years old, debt-free, conservative (although not totally adverse to risk), and greatly prefer long-term holds that do not require constant monitoring. My investment portfolio is strictly for the purpose of expediting my retirement, and I have no need of its funds for the foreseeable future.
Do you feel as if continuing to hold both would be beneficial, or would you recommend that I let one go and redeploy the capital elsewhere? If the later, which would you recommend I keep as a long term-hold?
Thank you.
