Q: I have seen in several answers you say you are encouraging tax loss selling in this market. Why? I don't see the reason to do that.
Let's use a hypothetical example. Last year I bought $10,000 of stock XYZ. It's fallen 50% so my paper loss is $5000. I sell the stock for a capital loss of $5000. I buy the stock back in 30 days (at the same price I sold it at), or I buy a proxy stock using the $5000 from the sale. Lucky me, one year from now stock XYZ has doubled and I now have a paper capital gain of $5000 (or the proxy stock I bought has doubled, and I have a $5000 gain). I sell the stock XYZ (or the proxy) and have a capital gain of $5000. The loss I generated from tax loss selling offsets the gain I made one year later. Net effect is 0, other than trading commissions.
If I had simply kept the stock XYZ, one year later I would be back at breakeven, no gain or loss.
If you believe in the stock as evidenced that you buy it back 30 days after selling it, or you buy a proxy and keep that, I don't see the point of tax loss selling for the sake of it. If you buy something completely different, that's a different story. But reading through the Q&A must people intend to buy the stock back in 30 days.
For this example keep in mind that the financial situation doesn't suddenly change; my tax bracket remains the same during this example.
Please explain why you are encouraging tax loss selling at this time. I don't see the point of doing this if you intend to buy back the same stock, and you remain within the same tax bracket. If you are relying on the stock being lower 30 days later when you buy it back that is market timing.
Paul
Let's use a hypothetical example. Last year I bought $10,000 of stock XYZ. It's fallen 50% so my paper loss is $5000. I sell the stock for a capital loss of $5000. I buy the stock back in 30 days (at the same price I sold it at), or I buy a proxy stock using the $5000 from the sale. Lucky me, one year from now stock XYZ has doubled and I now have a paper capital gain of $5000 (or the proxy stock I bought has doubled, and I have a $5000 gain). I sell the stock XYZ (or the proxy) and have a capital gain of $5000. The loss I generated from tax loss selling offsets the gain I made one year later. Net effect is 0, other than trading commissions.
If I had simply kept the stock XYZ, one year later I would be back at breakeven, no gain or loss.
If you believe in the stock as evidenced that you buy it back 30 days after selling it, or you buy a proxy and keep that, I don't see the point of tax loss selling for the sake of it. If you buy something completely different, that's a different story. But reading through the Q&A must people intend to buy the stock back in 30 days.
For this example keep in mind that the financial situation doesn't suddenly change; my tax bracket remains the same during this example.
Please explain why you are encouraging tax loss selling at this time. I don't see the point of doing this if you intend to buy back the same stock, and you remain within the same tax bracket. If you are relying on the stock being lower 30 days later when you buy it back that is market timing.
Paul