Q: Can I have your comments on CGI's latest acquisition. Will this acquisition have a positive influence on the stock or is it too small to make a difference. Your overall thoughts on the company would also be appreciated as well. My average cost is $33.42. Thank You. Brian
You can view 3 more answers this month. Sign up for a free trial for unlimited access.
Investment Q&A
Not investment advice or solicitation to buy/sell securities. Do your own due diligence and/or consult an advisor.
Q: Hi guys,
I asked this question about a year and a half ago but I will ask it again, is it time to let it go of NYX and find something else? I was originally thinking of keeping it for a long time but am having second thoughts.
Thanks so much
I asked this question about a year and a half ago but I will ask it again, is it time to let it go of NYX and find something else? I was originally thinking of keeping it for a long time but am having second thoughts.
Thanks so much
-
Chartwell Retirement Residences (CSH.UN)
-
Knight Therapeutics Inc. (GUD)
-
NorthWest Healthcare Properties Real Estate Investment Trust (NWH.UN)
Q: As a new member of 5i Research, I first want to thank you for the service you provide. Fantastic.
I am reviewing the Canadian portion of my RRSP, sector by sector. I have a balanced approach and 15+ years ahead of me before transferring to a RRIF.
I find myself a bit underweight and concentrated in Healthcare, owing only NHW.UN (4% of Canadian portfolio). I was thinking of switching half into CSH.UN for diversification within the Real Estate/Healthcare space, then add a 3% position in GUD for more growth. What are your thoughts?
Note: The US portion of my RRSP, which is half the size of my Canadian portfolio, is invested in Mutual funds with Healthcare/Big Pharma representing about 16% of my US holdings. So my strategy would bring Healthcare to 10% overall in my RRSP.
Thx.
I am reviewing the Canadian portion of my RRSP, sector by sector. I have a balanced approach and 15+ years ahead of me before transferring to a RRIF.
I find myself a bit underweight and concentrated in Healthcare, owing only NHW.UN (4% of Canadian portfolio). I was thinking of switching half into CSH.UN for diversification within the Real Estate/Healthcare space, then add a 3% position in GUD for more growth. What are your thoughts?
Note: The US portion of my RRSP, which is half the size of my Canadian portfolio, is invested in Mutual funds with Healthcare/Big Pharma representing about 16% of my US holdings. So my strategy would bring Healthcare to 10% overall in my RRSP.
Thx.
-
Cineplex Inc. (CGX)
-
Boyd Group Income Fund (BYD.UN)
-
BRP Inc. Subordinate Voting Shares (DOO)
-
Magna International Inc. (MG)
-
goeasy Ltd. (GSY)
-
New Look Vision Group Inc. (BCI)
Q: What's a good replacement for CGX?
Thanks,
Robert
Thanks,
Robert
Q: It seems to me that Cineplex should be valued more on cash flow, like a pipeline or a REIT, because of all the buildings it owns. For 2016, it claimed $106 million in depreciation, which of course lowered reported earnings by that amount. According to TD, 2018 FCF is estimated to be $3.46, making the stock actually somewhat cheap. Thoughts?
-
Suncor Energy Inc. (SU)
-
Enbridge Inc. (ENB)
-
Canadian Natural Resources Limited (CNQ)
-
Pembina Pipeline Corporation (PPL)
-
AltaGas Ltd. (ALA)
Q: My only energy holdings are ALA, ENB and PPL, representing 11% of my equity portfolio. I am considering SU or CNQ as an addition. Which do you prefer at this time, or would you view my energy holdings okay as is?
Q: Sorry, another on CGX. I'm curious about their dividend payout ratio please?
Thanks!
Rod C.
Thanks!
Rod C.
Q: Their 2nd q results appear strong. There is no conference call but I believe there is one analyst coverage. Please comment on results. Also, were the 2nd q results better or in line with the analyst estimate ( re sales, margin and net income)?. What is the analyst expecting for this current year and next year?
Q: Your comments on the quarter.
Q: Hi Peter
Just went through my portfolio and these are my asset mix results.
Tech - 19.8 %
Basic materials - 17.9%
Consumer Cyclical. - 11.7 %
Consumer Non Cyclical - 9.4 %
Energy - 9.0 %
Financial - 8.0 %
Reits - 4.5 %
Health - 3.4 %
Telecom - 3.8 %
What do you think of my sector waiting? Any thoughts on sector performance going forward... Should I be shifting my percentage on any of the above sectors going forward from here?
Appreciate your advice always!!
Just went through my portfolio and these are my asset mix results.
Tech - 19.8 %
Basic materials - 17.9%
Consumer Cyclical. - 11.7 %
Consumer Non Cyclical - 9.4 %
Energy - 9.0 %
Financial - 8.0 %
Reits - 4.5 %
Health - 3.4 %
Telecom - 3.8 %
What do you think of my sector waiting? Any thoughts on sector performance going forward... Should I be shifting my percentage on any of the above sectors going forward from here?
Appreciate your advice always!!
Q: Hi Peter and Team,
Some analysts still think CGX is expensive after over 30% share price drop. At what share price range CGX is reasonably priced based on current earning and outlook.
Thanks
Some analysts still think CGX is expensive after over 30% share price drop. At what share price range CGX is reasonably priced based on current earning and outlook.
Thanks
-
CCL Industries Inc. Unlimited Class B Non-Voting Shares (CCL.B)
-
Boyd Group Income Fund (BYD.UN)
-
Alimentation Couche-Tard Inc. (ATD)
Q: I have room for one of CCL.B, BYD.UN or ATD.B. Which has better growth prospects?
Q: On Nov 26, 2016 I asked if CRH has risen too quickly and was likely to decline materially. You mentioned the fundamentals were strong and it was not like other prominent TSX collapses of recent years.
Now that the stock has collapsed rather predictably I ask why do you still think share price momentum is a good thing to chase.
Now that the stock has collapsed rather predictably I ask why do you still think share price momentum is a good thing to chase.
Q: Hi, I currently own PBH, OTEX, ENB, TU, MX, CSU, SJ, and WCP. Please recommend 2 additional companies from the balanced portfolio to buy at current prices.
Thanks,
Brent
Thanks,
Brent
Q: Phm's earnings were not to bad. Why the drop in stock price?
Thanks
Thanks
Q: Would you admit that Avigilon is a much safer/ better investment now than about a year ago, and what would be the biggest risk going forward, thanks?
Q: I have held three percent holding in this reit for awhile and was quite pleased with the run up.The unannounced selloff hurt as a retail investor,seems to happen with regularly with low price deals and new shares issued.However after this sting im considering increasing to 5 percent at this lower price.What do you think of the metrics at this price ?
Q: Which would you prefer of BIP.UN and BEP.UN for a 2-3 year hold in a TFSA - Thanks, Ted
Q: Can I please get your opinion of SIS' newest acquisition.
Thanks
Dave
Thanks
Dave
Q: I'm stunned by this asset class I had not known about until seeing the link you provided in a recent answer. I had lost interest in preferreds after having them decline in share price upon reset to a low rate of yield.
These seem different. The reset is guaranteed to be a good amount of yield (e.g. 3.5%) no matter what. Which is more than good for me. It looks a lot like the safe bond that I wish existed but doesn't. (I am retired, don't need to touch my investments, just want them to grow a bit more than inflation, and NOT DECLINE, until such time as I need to start taking some income.
So what's the catch?
a) if interest rates rise, the value of the shares will go down? But that may not happen so much with these will it? Since the reset is also based on then-current interest rates plus the guaranteed amount. Plus most of the BNN experts say inflation seems to be the last thing that's going to happen anytime soon so rate increases won't be very rapid or substantial. And suppose they are wrong - as long as these are higher than bonds they wouldn't get sold off too much would they?
b) the company could get into trouble somehow and default. Let's say we pick a company that's stable and that won't happen.
c)..... what else do you think is important to consider.
These seem different. The reset is guaranteed to be a good amount of yield (e.g. 3.5%) no matter what. Which is more than good for me. It looks a lot like the safe bond that I wish existed but doesn't. (I am retired, don't need to touch my investments, just want them to grow a bit more than inflation, and NOT DECLINE, until such time as I need to start taking some income.
So what's the catch?
a) if interest rates rise, the value of the shares will go down? But that may not happen so much with these will it? Since the reset is also based on then-current interest rates plus the guaranteed amount. Plus most of the BNN experts say inflation seems to be the last thing that's going to happen anytime soon so rate increases won't be very rapid or substantial. And suppose they are wrong - as long as these are higher than bonds they wouldn't get sold off too much would they?
b) the company could get into trouble somehow and default. Let's say we pick a company that's stable and that won't happen.
c)..... what else do you think is important to consider.