Q: Are there any advantages to purchasing an international ETF off of a US exchange in US dollars. My understanding is that withholdings taxes would be the same as Canadian ETF's as long as both ETF's hold individual securities.
You can view 3 more answers this month. Sign up for a free trial for unlimited access.
Investment Q&A
Not investment advice or solicitation to buy/sell securities. Do your own due diligence and/or consult an advisor.
Q: Is there an ETF that replicates or comes close to the Beat-The-TSX (BTSX) approach?
I always enjoyed reading David Stanley's and other authors cover the BTSX in the Canadian MoneySaver Magazine.
Thanks
Frank
I always enjoyed reading David Stanley's and other authors cover the BTSX in the Canadian MoneySaver Magazine.
Thanks
Frank
-
BMO Covered Call Canadian Banks ETF (ZWB)
-
Hamilton Canadian Financials YIELD MAXIMIZER TM ETF (HMAX)
Q: How do these two ETF's compare?
Q: WOW a 14 % yield ! Too good to be true ?
Good/ bad points of this product and should this
ETF play any role in a RRIF. Thanks. Derek
Good/ bad points of this product and should this
ETF play any role in a RRIF. Thanks. Derek
Q: Please give me your read on this ETF. Is it a good allocation of capital in a growth industry, capital preservation and diversity?
Much appreciated.
Much appreciated.
-
BMO Covered Call Canadian Banks ETF (ZWB)
-
CI U.S. & Canada Lifeco Covered Call ETF (FLI)
-
iShares U.S. Insurance ETF (IAK)
Q: FLI has a good dividend but it is on its declining share value. It is contradictory in its performance as higher interest is supposed lift Life Ins companies earnings. Please advise what is the way to find out how these ETF burning through capital and do you have alternatives for this sector of financial cos.?
-
Vanguard FTSE Developed All Cap Ex U.S. Index ETF (VDU)
-
Vanguard FTSE Developed All Cap Ex U.S. Index ETF (CAD-hedged) (VEF)
Q: I hold these ETFs in both TFSA and RIFF accounts. Every month activity shows dividend in and out with 0$ net result . Tried to get an explanation from the discount broker but no help. Can you illuminate for me why the activity is shown that way?
Many thanks
Many thanks
-
Purpose US Cash Fund (PSU.U)
-
Global X USD Cash Maximizer Corporate Class ETF (HSUV.U)
-
US High Interest Savings Account Fund (HISU.U)
Q: Hello everyone,
I have U.S. cash on the sideline and would like to "park" it short term (3/6 mths), can you suggest where to place 20th$ ?
I need to keep funds in U.S. dollars.
Thanks and all the best !
I have U.S. cash on the sideline and would like to "park" it short term (3/6 mths), can you suggest where to place 20th$ ?
I need to keep funds in U.S. dollars.
Thanks and all the best !
Q: If a person had a modest amount to invest in their new RSP, say ~$8K, and a long time horizon, what would you suggest? Medium risk with DRIP if possible.
-
BMO Covered Call Canadian Banks ETF (ZWB)
-
Hamilton Canadian Financials YIELD MAXIMIZER TM ETF (HMAX)
Q: Thank you for your reply this morning on my question about ZWB and HMAX . In your reply you indicated a preference for ZWB because of the upside potential being greater . Am I right in assuming that if that is the case HMAX would be the less volatile of the two ?
Also in 2018 I asked 5I to crunch the numbers on the big five banks over the 18 years { 2000 to 2018 }... I would assume that is a long enough segment to determine an average annual return of dividend plus capital gain. The answer I got ranged between 11% on the low end { TD } to 14.3% on the high end { RY }...... Please correct my reasoning but to me it looks like HMAX with its' current 15.1% dividend based on today's cost of the ETF is going to slightly beat those numbers annually, have less volatility, and give me diversification as an added bonus ? ..... Please advise if my reasoning is sound .....Thanks Garth .....
Also in 2018 I asked 5I to crunch the numbers on the big five banks over the 18 years { 2000 to 2018 }... I would assume that is a long enough segment to determine an average annual return of dividend plus capital gain. The answer I got ranged between 11% on the low end { TD } to 14.3% on the high end { RY }...... Please correct my reasoning but to me it looks like HMAX with its' current 15.1% dividend based on today's cost of the ETF is going to slightly beat those numbers annually, have less volatility, and give me diversification as an added bonus ? ..... Please advise if my reasoning is sound .....Thanks Garth .....
Q: Wondering what your take is this week on entering ZWK? Would you wait a bit longer for the dust to settle? Goal is dividend income but for 5 year hold, not 20!
-
BMO Covered Call Canadian Banks ETF (ZWB)
-
Hamilton Canadian Financials YIELD MAXIMIZER TM ETF (HMAX)
Q: My TD Waterhouse account shows ZWB { yielding 8.2% } and HMAX { yielding 15.1% } . Could you please confirm both yield numbers at today's ETF prices ? And why one might buy the lower yielding ETF considering that HMAX has nearly double the yield and a little more diversified { 75% banks } ? ...... { I'm not concerned about the short history of HMAX } ..... Hypothetically, if it were " you " and you wanted a covered call financial ETF which one would you pick and why ? { Of if there is another one you would prefer over both }
-
Suncor Energy Inc. (SU)
-
Teck Resources Limited Class B Subordinate Voting Shares (TECK.B)
-
Barrick Gold Corporation (ABX)
Q: Hi Team
In general it seems like commodity stocks underperform the markets. Let’s look at SU, ABX and TECK which are large cap stocks in the oil, gold and copper categories. It seems commodity stocks had a good run from about 2003 - 2008. Since 2008, each of these three commodity stocks have traded in a range and are currently close to the top of said range. It seems like the commodity stocks have underperformed the overall market for the past 15 years by quite a bit because the commodity stocks are about the same price as they were in 2008. There have been times when buying commodity stocks as a “trade” was great like in 2020 when SU was $15 or in 2015 when TECK was $5 and in 2015 when ABX was $10. But today these stocks are all at the top of the range. They never break out of this range and I don’t see any evidence that they will break out of the range. If they don’t break out of the range the only direction from here is down. For example, gold is a whopping $2000, and ABX is still only $25. Oil was over $100 recently and SU still never broke out of the range. When the markets tank the commodity stocks usually tank as well…. they don’t act as a hedge. There are exceptions like in March 2020 when the market tanked, and ABX did quite well for 4 months. But today, ABX is back to $25 where it was in Feb 2020. I understand diversification is important but why add commodity stocks to a (long term) portfolio if they never perform well. The commodity stocks are finally paying good dividends but so do many other stocks in different sectors.
Question #1 – please let me know if you agree or disagree to the above. If you disagree, what is the compelling argument to buy large cap (safe) commodity stocks unless they are trading at the bottom of the range.
Question #2 – is there an etf that tracks the Canadian stock market that does not include commodity stocks?
Thanks for your great input to your members questions.
Greg
In general it seems like commodity stocks underperform the markets. Let’s look at SU, ABX and TECK which are large cap stocks in the oil, gold and copper categories. It seems commodity stocks had a good run from about 2003 - 2008. Since 2008, each of these three commodity stocks have traded in a range and are currently close to the top of said range. It seems like the commodity stocks have underperformed the overall market for the past 15 years by quite a bit because the commodity stocks are about the same price as they were in 2008. There have been times when buying commodity stocks as a “trade” was great like in 2020 when SU was $15 or in 2015 when TECK was $5 and in 2015 when ABX was $10. But today these stocks are all at the top of the range. They never break out of this range and I don’t see any evidence that they will break out of the range. If they don’t break out of the range the only direction from here is down. For example, gold is a whopping $2000, and ABX is still only $25. Oil was over $100 recently and SU still never broke out of the range. When the markets tank the commodity stocks usually tank as well…. they don’t act as a hedge. There are exceptions like in March 2020 when the market tanked, and ABX did quite well for 4 months. But today, ABX is back to $25 where it was in Feb 2020. I understand diversification is important but why add commodity stocks to a (long term) portfolio if they never perform well. The commodity stocks are finally paying good dividends but so do many other stocks in different sectors.
Question #1 – please let me know if you agree or disagree to the above. If you disagree, what is the compelling argument to buy large cap (safe) commodity stocks unless they are trading at the bottom of the range.
Question #2 – is there an etf that tracks the Canadian stock market that does not include commodity stocks?
Thanks for your great input to your members questions.
Greg
Q: If there was to be a turn around in financials (ie pause or cutting interest rates), how would the covered call bank ETF's perform vs holding bank stocks? Thanks
Q: I currently hold 2 preferreds in my RSP, BEP and CPX, both with a floor yield. While I have no compelling reason to sell either (both are up between 5-10% based on my purchase price and disregarding dividends), I note that ZPR has a slightly higher yield and would be much easier to sell should I want to. What do you see as the pros and cons of selling the 2 individual preferreds and replacing with ZPR? Assuming (?) that rates have somewhat stabilized and are probably more likely to decrease long term rather than go higher, how would this affect the price of ZPR? Does the price of ZPR react more to interest rates or the overall market direction?
My objective here is more income-oriented that capital gains.
Thank-you, Grant
My objective here is more income-oriented that capital gains.
Thank-you, Grant
Q: In a balanced RIF account. Looking for consistent yield and some appreciation. What do you think about swapping out BLV for JEPI? Totally different co's I know but..with a possible Fed pause and likely interest rate reversals in the next year or so, will this give BLV a boost, and maybe worth keeping
Q: Hi
BMOInvestorline offers a HISA currently paying 4.35% interest accrued daily and paid monthly. It is not locked in and I can withdraw at anytime without penalty. I haven't found a better rate anywhere. Even EQ Bank only pays 2.5% in its savings account.
I haven't been able to find a "catch" but this seems too good to be true. Am I missing something? Or is this a really prudent way to keep the cash component of my portfolio, assuming I'm going to keep some cash.
Thanks
Robert
BMOInvestorline offers a HISA currently paying 4.35% interest accrued daily and paid monthly. It is not locked in and I can withdraw at anytime without penalty. I haven't found a better rate anywhere. Even EQ Bank only pays 2.5% in its savings account.
I haven't been able to find a "catch" but this seems too good to be true. Am I missing something? Or is this a really prudent way to keep the cash component of my portfolio, assuming I'm going to keep some cash.
Thanks
Robert
Q: Hi Peter,
A lot of high yield ETFs distribution contains a return of capital, which means you get back a portion of your own invested money. It seems to me this is a marketing ploy used by the ETFs to entice investors with a return that is no ‘real’. Which is better for an investor whose primary goal is to increase her wealth and not aiming for a certain amount of monthly/annual income distribution - a plain ETF that has a yield of 4% or a high yield ETF that has a yield of 6% which includes a return of capital of 2.5%? For investors, are there any drawbacks or concerns for ‘return of capital’ feature apart from the necessary book keeping of adjusted cost? Thanks.
A lot of high yield ETFs distribution contains a return of capital, which means you get back a portion of your own invested money. It seems to me this is a marketing ploy used by the ETFs to entice investors with a return that is no ‘real’. Which is better for an investor whose primary goal is to increase her wealth and not aiming for a certain amount of monthly/annual income distribution - a plain ETF that has a yield of 4% or a high yield ETF that has a yield of 6% which includes a return of capital of 2.5%? For investors, are there any drawbacks or concerns for ‘return of capital’ feature apart from the necessary book keeping of adjusted cost? Thanks.
-
Financial Select Sector SPDR (XLF)
-
iShares U.S. Insurance ETF (IAK)
-
iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF (TLT)
Q: If interest rates and inflation are going to peak, do you think these ETFs (XLF, IAK TLT) have opportunity now? If so which one has most potential right now? Thank you.
Q: How are the returns on these money ETFs taxed?
Is it better to hold this type of ETF in a registered acct?
Is it better to hold this type of ETF in a registered acct?