Q: Your comment on PHM splitting into two companies prompts a few questions:
Do you think Hoyt and Crawford had a difficult relationship so Hoyt decided to take his company out of PHM and do his own thing with the company he sold to PHM? He owns 20M shares @$1.46. Crawford now has his company that he sold to PHM for which he took 33M shares @ .33. Do you think Hoyt was squeezed out?
Dalsin, as Chairman, was toxic and the news release says he is "outgoing". Glad he's out. Is this a major plus for both companies?
Finally, PHM presently has 375M shares? Does each company retain half that number?
As a shareholder who loved the business plan "pre-chaos" I am excited about new names ridding us of PHM'S heavy baggage - and Dalsin! I say go for it and may both men win!
Do you think Hoyt and Crawford had a difficult relationship so Hoyt decided to take his company out of PHM and do his own thing with the company he sold to PHM? He owns 20M shares @$1.46. Crawford now has his company that he sold to PHM for which he took 33M shares @ .33. Do you think Hoyt was squeezed out?
Dalsin, as Chairman, was toxic and the news release says he is "outgoing". Glad he's out. Is this a major plus for both companies?
Finally, PHM presently has 375M shares? Does each company retain half that number?
As a shareholder who loved the business plan "pre-chaos" I am excited about new names ridding us of PHM'S heavy baggage - and Dalsin! I say go for it and may both men win!