Q: There was an article in the G&M today (Dec. 14th) that I found interesting. https://www.theglobeandmail.com/investing/article-if-stocks-crashed-what-portfolio-would-you-want/
It suggested that a portfolio of 25% each of gold, cash or equivalent, long bonds and equity would have returned 7% plus annually over the last 30 some years, with the worst year being 2013 when it would have declined only 0.5%. It goes on to suggest some ETF’s that could make up this “Permanent Portfolio”. In the current environment, and knowing that past performance won’t necessarily be repeated going forward, the strategy looks crazy to me. Not sure if you would have read the article or if the “Permanent Portfolio” is a generally known thing, but any thoughts?
It suggested that a portfolio of 25% each of gold, cash or equivalent, long bonds and equity would have returned 7% plus annually over the last 30 some years, with the worst year being 2013 when it would have declined only 0.5%. It goes on to suggest some ETF’s that could make up this “Permanent Portfolio”. In the current environment, and knowing that past performance won’t necessarily be repeated going forward, the strategy looks crazy to me. Not sure if you would have read the article or if the “Permanent Portfolio” is a generally known thing, but any thoughts?