Q: On several occasions when responding to questions about WELL you mention risk - an excellent point as it is a relatively small company.
But in comparison to many other smaller companies there are important aspects that in my mind mitigate the risk somewhat. For example:
- the quality and reputation of management and its obvious ability to attract investors
- founded first and foremost on the ownership of health clinics (relatively stable recurring revenue, insulated somewhat from recessions)
- disciplined/focused in its choice of foundational corporate software platform (i.e. OSCAR). OSCAR is open source and free of royalties - think of RedHat's success. OSCAR is its singular software focus - think Westjet and the cost savings by limiting maintenance to only one type of aircraft. And then the cost/effort when it comes to adding new functionality (e.g. telemedicine) to your product like all software products must do.
None of this guarantees unqualified success in the marketplace of course but what additional risks should an investor in WELL consider? Thank you.
But in comparison to many other smaller companies there are important aspects that in my mind mitigate the risk somewhat. For example:
- the quality and reputation of management and its obvious ability to attract investors
- founded first and foremost on the ownership of health clinics (relatively stable recurring revenue, insulated somewhat from recessions)
- disciplined/focused in its choice of foundational corporate software platform (i.e. OSCAR). OSCAR is open source and free of royalties - think of RedHat's success. OSCAR is its singular software focus - think Westjet and the cost savings by limiting maintenance to only one type of aircraft. And then the cost/effort when it comes to adding new functionality (e.g. telemedicine) to your product like all software products must do.
None of this guarantees unqualified success in the marketplace of course but what additional risks should an investor in WELL consider? Thank you.