Q: Hi Peter,
I enjoyed your article again in the FP, as I always do. I do think the 60/40 split is an old market axiom that has outlived its time. I understand the bond argument for balance and income. I am lucky to have a DB pension, so I don’ t need bond income. Similarly, if I want to sleep better, I move into lower beta or value names, which I have done. My question, if you don’t mind me asking, is what is the average bond weighting of your staff in your portfolios?
Thanks again.
Dave
I enjoyed your article again in the FP, as I always do. I do think the 60/40 split is an old market axiom that has outlived its time. I understand the bond argument for balance and income. I am lucky to have a DB pension, so I don’ t need bond income. Similarly, if I want to sleep better, I move into lower beta or value names, which I have done. My question, if you don’t mind me asking, is what is the average bond weighting of your staff in your portfolios?
Thanks again.
Dave