Q: I just read Phil Town's "Rule #1" where he argues, amongst other things that return on equity (aka book value), sales growth, EPS growth, Cash flow and ROIC are the strongest indicators for long term growth. He argues that, ideally we'd invest in companies that have at least 10% growth in each category for each of the past 10 years - a lofty goal to be sure.
Generally, how do you feel about the aforementioned metrics to assess the quality of an invesment. Would you keep them in the same order of priority and would you add any to the mix?
For the record, the only stock I can find that comes close to meeting the 10% increase per year threshold is CSU so maybe there's something to it!
Cam.
Generally, how do you feel about the aforementioned metrics to assess the quality of an invesment. Would you keep them in the same order of priority and would you add any to the mix?
For the record, the only stock I can find that comes close to meeting the 10% increase per year threshold is CSU so maybe there's something to it!
Cam.