Q: The Globe ran a piece on assessing 231 Canadian Corporate Boards of Directors according to 35 criteria. A number of 5i portfolio companies such as SJ, WPK, DHX, ENGH, CSU, KXS, ATD, and PBH were in the bottom ranked third of the list, do you have any comment about that assessment? The way the criteria are structured, it would be easier for larger companies to properly diversify their Boards and get a higher ranking, but I was quite surprised to see names like GWO, OCX and FFH quite close to the bottom. A glaring stat is that only 12% of Board members are women.
Q: At the recommendations of 5i I purchased these stocks in April/16 for my TFSA account. I have additional funds of $11000 to add. Would you recommend adding to these positions or purchase other stocks? My return has been in excess of 30% and therefore value 5i opinions. Thanks for your excellent service.
Q: It looks to me like Interfor is being sucked down bu the US softwood lumber dispute. However, I understand that it exports very littler for Canada to US, since it produces the vast majorirty of its lumber in the USA!
Q: Not that you need another CRH question. So just a comment. It is interesting that it could pile up 4x average volume with only two trades as big as 10,000 shares. Jitters and shorts maybe. "Frisco Fastball" posted an extremist sounding article on Friday: "CRH Medical Corp Can't Be More Risky - Trades Significantly Lower". The almost substance-free article is accessible via Google Finance.
Q: Please provide the "Cash Flow per Share" (TTM) for the above listed companies. I've tried many financial sites but can't find CF/S information for them. Why?
Q: Although I am using CRH in the heading this question is really applicable to any number of situations where a share price drops on an analyst's "downgrade", especially when there is no material news on the company e.g. - management malfeasance, loss of a contract etc.
I am not particularly concerned here about the company's future and fully expect the share price to go back to where it was relatively soon, especially in light of the fact that the target price is higher that what it was trading at and that the consensus price is much lower that the new target.
But I am left wondering why this or any other stock would have dropped so much. Is it because it was an RBC analyst and as a matter of course, all RBC brokers are instructed to put in sell orders (their clients are probably all up given the recent share price increases) to show clients the value of their firm's research (and then start buying it back when the price drops) or are there trading programs that always sell on downgrades or is this a particularly "good" analyst with a wide following or am I just being too cynical?
As I said, this isn't just about CRH and RBC. Or is every situation so different that you can't generalize and this is just "noise" that should be taken with a grain of salt?
Q: Now that there are 11 sectors in the Toronto TSX what would be your Sector allocations for a Conservative dividend and some growth oriented 45 year old investor.
Thank you.... Paul K.
Q: Peter and Ryan, appreciate all that you do both with this service and with your blogs and bnn segments.
My question/comment is valuation based. I began investing a few years ago and was taught/told and preached how important valuation plays as a factor in stock picking. A few years later said value/cheap stocks I got in generally underperformed while all the higher valued companies continue to appreciate. Just this past summer I held off on such stocks with strong fundamentals such as BIP.UN, CSU, NVDA, RBA and MTY because of "expensive" valuations only to continue to watch them go higher as I've seen this story play out time and time again since I began investing. So now I concentrate on fundamentals and technicals for confirmation and not so much valuations. I know you guys don't mind paying up for quality and growth generally so just wanting your thoughts and comments on the matter. Thanks.
Q: Comment on the odd lot fill for a board lot order: the same thing happened to me on a thinly traded US stock and I protested enough that the broker offered to charge just one commission instead of multiple to fill the order. One more reason to trade just US very liquid stocks and TSX stocks where this isn't a problem.
Q: On October 24th you posted an article by Michael titled Looking for Profits During Tax-Loss Season. In the article thete is a list of companies and it sets out their percentage decline this year and their expected growth the next year. What are the top 5 companies in this list you would recommend based on fundamentals that are currently valued attractively that will grow in 2017?
Q: I have a $700,000 portfolio 50/50 including a mix of ETF's and stocks - blue chip value /dividend. I also have $60,000 in a GIC ladder with Oaken many at 2.5%-2.75% in TFSA accounts. There is $200,000 in a cash account, $50,000 with Oaken at 1.75%. I am 70.
I am expecting an inheritance of $300,000. Should I put this in more GIC's with Home Bank and Oaken or start a new series with your Income Portfolio or is there another suggestion?