Q: Peter & Associates
Using Enbridge Inc. as a bellwether, yearend numbers from 2000 to 2009 produced the following averages: A mean P/E of 16.5, (several years in the 13 range) a growing dividend with an average yield of 3.1 % representing 50% of earnings and 75% of 10 year TBs when they ranged from 5.4 to 4 %. A check of a recent brokerage report places its debt level at 60% which seems well in line with those over the referenced period.
Clearly the dynamics have changed. Might what is playing out in industries which traditionally need constant access to new capital, be it common or preferred shares are seen as better planning tools providing them with greater option flexibilities than fixed income alternatives? Whereas interest payments must be made, dividends must be declared? With concerns being expressed, a 10 year rate over 3% could do more harm than good, is ENB oversold and at this price too good to be true? It would seem rates would have to rise a lot to actually come into competition with the yields ENB equities offer.
If someone were investing in an ENB for yield, it would seem logical to suggest they would also seek moderate capital risks, far less than what this one has experienced. Is a projected forward P/E of 20 and a dividend over 6% which ENB claims will increase, warning signals? Assuming it is a good bellwether security, how much more downside could this stock potentially see and/or how likely/ risky the need to eventually cut the dividend ( common)? Albeit a very different industry and dynamics, energy stocks had to make cuts to reflect their financial realities; even non CAD banks went through well documented challenging times. The point, no industry is immune from economic realities and their balance sheet realities. Concerns over debt are being expressed as rates rise.
Having a well balanced portfolio is a protection but, so called bond proxies are found in multiple sectors and collectively can add up to an important exposure. There is an expression, things tend to eventually revert to their mean. That said, might we be seeing the start of that occurring since these are not generally seen as growth stocks where earning growth is the offsetting factor to deal with these high ratios?
Would very much appreciate your insight. Thank you.
Mike
Using Enbridge Inc. as a bellwether, yearend numbers from 2000 to 2009 produced the following averages: A mean P/E of 16.5, (several years in the 13 range) a growing dividend with an average yield of 3.1 % representing 50% of earnings and 75% of 10 year TBs when they ranged from 5.4 to 4 %. A check of a recent brokerage report places its debt level at 60% which seems well in line with those over the referenced period.
Clearly the dynamics have changed. Might what is playing out in industries which traditionally need constant access to new capital, be it common or preferred shares are seen as better planning tools providing them with greater option flexibilities than fixed income alternatives? Whereas interest payments must be made, dividends must be declared? With concerns being expressed, a 10 year rate over 3% could do more harm than good, is ENB oversold and at this price too good to be true? It would seem rates would have to rise a lot to actually come into competition with the yields ENB equities offer.
If someone were investing in an ENB for yield, it would seem logical to suggest they would also seek moderate capital risks, far less than what this one has experienced. Is a projected forward P/E of 20 and a dividend over 6% which ENB claims will increase, warning signals? Assuming it is a good bellwether security, how much more downside could this stock potentially see and/or how likely/ risky the need to eventually cut the dividend ( common)? Albeit a very different industry and dynamics, energy stocks had to make cuts to reflect their financial realities; even non CAD banks went through well documented challenging times. The point, no industry is immune from economic realities and their balance sheet realities. Concerns over debt are being expressed as rates rise.
Having a well balanced portfolio is a protection but, so called bond proxies are found in multiple sectors and collectively can add up to an important exposure. There is an expression, things tend to eventually revert to their mean. That said, might we be seeing the start of that occurring since these are not generally seen as growth stocks where earning growth is the offsetting factor to deal with these high ratios?
Would very much appreciate your insight. Thank you.
Mike
