Q: What do you think of Europe and specifically of ZWP? It's been trading within the same range since March and while the yield of 6.75% is nice, it has very high MER of 1.7% and barely moves with the market. The ETF is in my RRSP. Would you replace it with something else or wait patiently for Europe's recovery?
You can view 3 more answers this month. Sign up for a free trial for unlimited access.
Investment Q&A
Not investment advice or solicitation to buy/sell securities. Do your own due diligence and/or consult an advisor.
Q: Could you give me your take on Doximity earnings please?
-
Brookfield Renewable Partners L.P. (BEP.UN)
-
NFI Group Inc. (NFI)
-
Brookfield Infrastructure Partners L.P. (BIP.UN)
Q: I believe all of the companies have reported. May I have your comments please.
Q: This is a follow up question to my prior question about ETF safety.
You stated “Bond funds had three very bad years. When rates moved higher, nearly every bond fund declined. In a steep market correction, few equity funds would be immune to decline as well.”
Are you saying that the money lost by XSB and XLB cannot be recovered even if rates go back to the very low rates they were at before? And this is due to a sudden market change, which caused more people to want to sell than buy these ETFs, as opposed to the fund reflecting the underlying status of their respective bond market?
In other words, are you saying that these ETFs do not accurately reflect what they’re supposed to due to inherent problems with ETFs in general? And these issues could occur in any, including large and broad, ETFs given enough market instability?
Or, are you saying this is what occurred in the short term, but the price will correct over time, so if you hold on, eventually you will not loose money more than the underlying assets?
Sorry for the long question, but I found your answer a little concerning and wanted to be specific. I hope you understand what I mean.
You stated “Bond funds had three very bad years. When rates moved higher, nearly every bond fund declined. In a steep market correction, few equity funds would be immune to decline as well.”
Are you saying that the money lost by XSB and XLB cannot be recovered even if rates go back to the very low rates they were at before? And this is due to a sudden market change, which caused more people to want to sell than buy these ETFs, as opposed to the fund reflecting the underlying status of their respective bond market?
In other words, are you saying that these ETFs do not accurately reflect what they’re supposed to due to inherent problems with ETFs in general? And these issues could occur in any, including large and broad, ETFs given enough market instability?
Or, are you saying this is what occurred in the short term, but the price will correct over time, so if you hold on, eventually you will not loose money more than the underlying assets?
Sorry for the long question, but I found your answer a little concerning and wanted to be specific. I hope you understand what I mean.
Q: If I own shares of this both as a CDR and Nasdaq holding are they treated as having a different capital cost for tax purposes?
Q: In the Growth Portfolio which stock would you buy now for 2025 TFSA contribution? Long term hold, thinking GSY as it has the highest rating in the portfolio.
Thanks Ron
Thanks Ron
Q: Hello Peter,
CSU's results did not beat estimates , yet stock is up. If other companies had similar results, the response in the market may not be that great. Is it due to constellation's history of being a good capital allocator? I saw this article on yahoo, link provided with an extract ,
"Toronto-based Constellation reported third-quarter financial results after the closing bell on Friday, booking a higher profit on an annualized basis, topping analyst expectations. Revenue for the three months ended Sept. 30 fell shy of estimates, while rising nearly 20 per cent year-over-year to US$2.5 billion."
https://ca.finance.yahoo.com/news/dubbed-canadas-berkshire-hathaway-constellation-softwares-stock-seen-hitting-new-all-time-high-162056191.html
Question,
Could you explain the higher profit that exceeded the estimates in the above extract? Thanks very much
CSU's results did not beat estimates , yet stock is up. If other companies had similar results, the response in the market may not be that great. Is it due to constellation's history of being a good capital allocator? I saw this article on yahoo, link provided with an extract ,
"Toronto-based Constellation reported third-quarter financial results after the closing bell on Friday, booking a higher profit on an annualized basis, topping analyst expectations. Revenue for the three months ended Sept. 30 fell shy of estimates, while rising nearly 20 per cent year-over-year to US$2.5 billion."
https://ca.finance.yahoo.com/news/dubbed-canadas-berkshire-hathaway-constellation-softwares-stock-seen-hitting-new-all-time-high-162056191.html
Question,
Could you explain the higher profit that exceeded the estimates in the above extract? Thanks very much
Q: Could you please provide update on MP Materials. What is their balance sheet? Would you buy it?
Thanks,
Milan
Thanks,
Milan
Q: You have consistently talked about your admiration for BN operationally. It has been trading in range for almost five years and is now hitting out a large breakout, almost independent of its subsidiaries. I know their CEO had spoken about the benefits of dropping rates. Any other comments on the rally here? Do you see it sticking for BN and also compared to private equity peers?
Q: Hello 5i Team: As a long time holder of Fiera wondering if outflows of assets will continue and how the recent 4 billion will affect bottom line.Is the 10% draw down warrented? Thanks Mike
Q: CBIL holds Canadian treasury bills and TDB2913 is a money market mutual fund. It looks to me CBIL is safer with basically the same yield am I missing anything? Thanks
Q: Analysis on the quarter and outlook.
Thanks Greg
Thanks Greg
Q: Good afternoon,
I have a full position in ITA, would a switch to XLI which has 22% Aerospace & Defense be wise at this juncture for the added diversification while still having defense stock exposure or do you see defense outperforming?
I have a full position in ITA, would a switch to XLI which has 22% Aerospace & Defense be wise at this juncture for the added diversification while still having defense stock exposure or do you see defense outperforming?
-
Constellation Software Inc. (CSU)
-
Descartes Systems Group Inc. (The) (DSG)
-
Kinaxis Inc. (KXS)
-
Shopify Inc. Class A Subordinate Voting Shares (SHOP)
-
Canadian General Investments Limited (CGI)
-
Open Text Corporation (OTEX)
Q: Hi 5i,
I really like your creation of DOCCKS through amalgamating those 6 Canadian names, and the comparative 5 yr history you've put together of some salient numbers.
I think it might be helpful to also see where the money comes from, and wonder if you would also be able to break down the geographical origin (percentagewise) of each company's revenue and, further, compare those results to the net profit, FCF etc resulting from each geographical source of revenue?
Thanks 5i,
Peter
I really like your creation of DOCCKS through amalgamating those 6 Canadian names, and the comparative 5 yr history you've put together of some salient numbers.
I think it might be helpful to also see where the money comes from, and wonder if you would also be able to break down the geographical origin (percentagewise) of each company's revenue and, further, compare those results to the net profit, FCF etc resulting from each geographical source of revenue?
Thanks 5i,
Peter
-
Global X High Interest Savings ETF (CASH)
-
Harvest Canadian T-Bill ETF (TBIL)
-
Global X USD High Interest Savings ETF (UCSH.U)
Q: I’m trying to understand the risk I’m up against with investments in CASH and UCSH.U. Both have significant holdings in Scotiabank and National Bank investments. My portfolio percentage positions in these two is quite significant.
- Do you have options for better diversification of my cash holdings?
- In the event of “something going off the rails”, what impact does this have on an investor of these two investments like me in the event of a bail-in of either Scotiabank or National Bank because of these holdings within the two ETF's?
- Do you have options for better diversification of my cash holdings?
- In the event of “something going off the rails”, what impact does this have on an investor of these two investments like me in the event of a bail-in of either Scotiabank or National Bank because of these holdings within the two ETF's?
Q: Good morning,
Recently I have become concerned about the potential for a US sovereign debt crisis. From my understanding the amount of US debt is growing at an unsustainable rate and eventually it will become apparent that the US cannot pay back its debt while offering a real return to investors. Once this happens the US will have an issue borrowing money because there is a lack of lenders which will lead to them either having to cut back services (which would almost certainly cause a recession), defaulting because they can't roll over their debt (also causing a recession) or trying to change the rules of the fed to try and print the debt away (which would cause almost nobody to lend money to the US government again and almost certainly cause hyper inflation). To me any action that would involve cutting back services which would be better for the long term but really bad (and political suicide) for the short term would probably not be implemented because the politicians would be voted out. This line of thinking terrifies me and I am really hoping that I am missing something. Am I correct with my analysis? Is there anything that I am missing?
Thanks,
A
Recently I have become concerned about the potential for a US sovereign debt crisis. From my understanding the amount of US debt is growing at an unsustainable rate and eventually it will become apparent that the US cannot pay back its debt while offering a real return to investors. Once this happens the US will have an issue borrowing money because there is a lack of lenders which will lead to them either having to cut back services (which would almost certainly cause a recession), defaulting because they can't roll over their debt (also causing a recession) or trying to change the rules of the fed to try and print the debt away (which would cause almost nobody to lend money to the US government again and almost certainly cause hyper inflation). To me any action that would involve cutting back services which would be better for the long term but really bad (and political suicide) for the short term would probably not be implemented because the politicians would be voted out. This line of thinking terrifies me and I am really hoping that I am missing something. Am I correct with my analysis? Is there anything that I am missing?
Thanks,
A
Q: As a general rule do most bond funds have a set philosophy about duration or do they simply employ funds based on what they think makes sense at that particular time?
Thank you
Thank you
Q: could i get analysis on earnings- doesn't look good on the surface - just a delay in orders?
Q: I have very little faith in the go forward value of the Canadian dollar versus the US dollar.Whats are good equity ways to access exposure in a broad sense to the US$?
Q: Would u consider the the fundstrat etfs such as GRNY new? and DQML a buy
Are they hi risk
Can u give the performance and fees ?
Ty
Are they hi risk
Can u give the performance and fees ?
Ty