Q: Can you please further my understanding of enterprise value. I think it is the name that throws me off.
I fully understand how its calculation works, I fully understand how the ratios work but I have difficulty with the term. I feel like things are backwards.
For example: If we have a company that has a Market Cap of $1M, it has an enterprise VALUE of $1M (assuming no debt, no cash,...). If the company has a Market Cap of $1M and $1M in debt, it has an enterprise VALUE of $2M. This company has a VALUE of $2M vs the other company that has a VALUE of $1M. If these were 2 competitors, I would prefer the company with the LOWER VALUE (and that is the way it is but the numbers actually reflect the opposite). If I was buying the business, I would probably want to pay $0 for the company with the debt ($1M market cap - $1m Debt) and $1M for the company with no debt.
If a company has cash, I would want to pay market cap PLUS its cash / cash equivalent but in determining VALUE we deduct the amount. Once again it appears backwards.
I must be missing something here. Personally, per my understanding, I would have deducted debt and added cash to determine the VALUE of the enterprise.
It is the word VALUE that throws me off. Can you please shed some light on this. Thank You.
I fully understand how its calculation works, I fully understand how the ratios work but I have difficulty with the term. I feel like things are backwards.
For example: If we have a company that has a Market Cap of $1M, it has an enterprise VALUE of $1M (assuming no debt, no cash,...). If the company has a Market Cap of $1M and $1M in debt, it has an enterprise VALUE of $2M. This company has a VALUE of $2M vs the other company that has a VALUE of $1M. If these were 2 competitors, I would prefer the company with the LOWER VALUE (and that is the way it is but the numbers actually reflect the opposite). If I was buying the business, I would probably want to pay $0 for the company with the debt ($1M market cap - $1m Debt) and $1M for the company with no debt.
If a company has cash, I would want to pay market cap PLUS its cash / cash equivalent but in determining VALUE we deduct the amount. Once again it appears backwards.
I must be missing something here. Personally, per my understanding, I would have deducted debt and added cash to determine the VALUE of the enterprise.
It is the word VALUE that throws me off. Can you please shed some light on this. Thank You.