skip to content
  1. Home
  2. >
  3. Investment Q&A
You can view 3 more answers this month. Sign up for a free trial for unlimited access.

Investment Q&A

Not investment advice or solicitation to buy/sell securities. Do your own due diligence and/or consult an advisor.

Q: You guys hit a home run with GRUB and SPOT which had a recent downgrade but still put up big numbers. I was lucky enough to have taken your advice and bought both of them and am up 35% and 45% respectively in a short period of time. Do you think there is more room for them to run? Would you have a couple of others with a growth outlook like that? Thanks for the hot advice, Dennis
Read Answer Asked by Dennis on July 27, 2018
Q: hi Peter, In my previous question, regarding good candidates for covered call strategy. I forgot to mention that interested in US stocks due to better option premium. Can you please provide 5-6 names . dividend payment would be bonus. Thanks
Read Answer Asked by RUPINDER on July 27, 2018
Q: Greetings 5i
If the Kitimat LNG project gets the green light. Can you give a breakdown of the companies that stand to gain from this enormous endeavour?
Thanks
Denis
Read Answer Asked by Denis on July 27, 2018
Q: Unsure if this was sent a few mins ago.Reportedly VET reports on July 30(opening or closing?) with estimated 0.22 EPS & $375.01m revenue.Does the results include the acquisition of SPE? 2)What are the whisper numbers,if any? 3)Is this a good time to start a position? 4)Between VET & PXT,which would you choose?Thanks for u usual great services & opinions.
Read Answer Asked by Peter on July 27, 2018
Q: Hi,
Is there an ETF that holds only a higher concentration of the FAANG stocks? I looked at the FNG but it does not seem to hold FB (could only find top 10 holdings). I’d like exposure to these growth names and maybe now good time to start a position with the declines in Netflix, and FB.
Thanks,
K.
Read Answer Asked by KERRI on July 26, 2018
Q: Hoping for some education on economics here. In an answer to Terrance about portfolio weightings, you were suggesting 20% be allocated to Industrials and 5% to Materials. I would have thought Materials would have been higher in this scenario on the assumption that a strong industrial sector would boost raw material costs.

Is the reason for the suggested minimal Materials allocation because of your oft-stated concern that Material producers tend to be price takers and not price makers or is there an underlying economic reason where material costs are shown to lag production increases?

Appreciate your insight.

Paul F.
Read Answer Asked by Paul on July 26, 2018
Looking for more? Sign up for a FREE 14 day trial! No credit card required

We invite you to sign up for a 14 day free trial of 5i Research!
Experience all the benefits and tools we have to offer; stock research, model portfolios, Q&A with our experts, and so much more. Join a community of like-minded investors today!