Q: I AM RE-SENDING. SOMEHOW MY QUESTIONS WAS NOT SENT. IF YOU DID RECEIVE THE ORIGINAL MY APOLOGIES.
Hello Peter and team,
I am considering adding to non-reg. acct. these preferred issues: BEP.PR.I; PPL.PR.M; TRP.PR.J; NA.PR.X for a steady predictable income for 5+ years. It is my understanding that these all have a minimum rate reset except NA which GOC yield + 4.90%. First could you rate these in terms of credit risk with the understanding that they all face the same interest rate risks going forward). Second, BEP.PR.I is a limited partnership issue and its distributions will be a mix of ordinary income, Canadian dividends and return of capital so would this be better held in a RRSP or are there any other complications here? Third, can you advise if these preferred stocks qualify as low credit risk overall, or are there others you would choose that would qualify as better credit risk while providing similar yields with a fixed rate reset feature and downward protection. If so could you suggest 4 or 5 better alternatives and advise why you feel they would be viewed as superior. Finally, am I correct in assuming that the minimum rate reset feature provides more downward protection should interest rates in fact rise 4 to 5 years from now.
Thanks for your great advice.
Joseph
Hello Peter and team,
I am considering adding to non-reg. acct. these preferred issues: BEP.PR.I; PPL.PR.M; TRP.PR.J; NA.PR.X for a steady predictable income for 5+ years. It is my understanding that these all have a minimum rate reset except NA which GOC yield + 4.90%. First could you rate these in terms of credit risk with the understanding that they all face the same interest rate risks going forward). Second, BEP.PR.I is a limited partnership issue and its distributions will be a mix of ordinary income, Canadian dividends and return of capital so would this be better held in a RRSP or are there any other complications here? Third, can you advise if these preferred stocks qualify as low credit risk overall, or are there others you would choose that would qualify as better credit risk while providing similar yields with a fixed rate reset feature and downward protection. If so could you suggest 4 or 5 better alternatives and advise why you feel they would be viewed as superior. Finally, am I correct in assuming that the minimum rate reset feature provides more downward protection should interest rates in fact rise 4 to 5 years from now.
Thanks for your great advice.
Joseph