Investment Q&A

Q: At this stage in the game if you had to choose one to hold which would you pick? Or would you go 50-50. Thanks!

Jason

Q: Robinhood had eleven times the usual business last night, They have 24 hour trading . 80,000,000 Americans trade Bitcoin in some way according to Trump and Harris and this is why they backed it. Think of all the votes . Betting on Elections will become a World Wide Event .

24 hour trading 7 days a week will soon be in .

Robinhood will benefit from all this .

I think HOOD is a great Buy. Your comments please RAK

Q: What does the market expect from CSU on Friday/
?

Thx

Q: Could you compare these two for a 2 to 3 year hold and do you prefer one over the other? Thanx.

Q: Regarding LMN’s latest quarter, how do metrics compare with the early days of CSU and TOI around free cash flow and organic growth since these were the weak spots. Did CSU or TOI experience these same drops or weaknesses and how did they turn it around?
Thanks!

Q: Hi Folks,
Trying to raise some cash in my non registered account. Reducing the number of stocks in the account. Currently have ISRG and ABBV as my health sector holdings and both have done well. I also hold ABBV in my RRSP. All things being equal, which one would you sell. Account is growth focused.
Thanks

Q: What is your view of the company after the latest results. Would recommend adding/buying after the jump?
Appreciate your insight, Peter

Q: For a 2 to 3 year hold, which company would you buy today LMN or CSU,
and why?

Thanks, Chuck

Q: I plan on adding to two of these companies for a 3 to 5 year hold. Please give your rankings from best downwards (with a few comments as to your reasoning)
Thanks. ram

Q: Hello 5iR,
Path has been recommended on BNN. Would it be a good time to buy some?
Your opinion of this company is appreciated. Thank you. Cheers.

Q: How worried (and why) are you about the Earnings coming out on Friday for CSU?

Q: Wow, big jump in stock price. Any new thoughts on adding to a small position?

Q: Confused about LMN. Results weren't great. 5i warned before market opened on Monday that direction of stock was in doubt so you suggested a hold rating. Then on Monday, LMN increases 11% on decent volume for the stock. What gives? What positives do others see? Did 'new' news come out? I realize being an off shoot of CSU is a big plus.

Q: Hi 5i Team - A link from Yahoo Finance on news for Lumine today took me to Simply Wall Street which raised three concerns for the company: 1) Earnings have declined by about 80% per year over the past 5 years; 2) Shareholders have been substantially diluted in the past year; 3) There has been significant insider selling over the past 3 months.
For number 1) how reliable is this information especially considering Lumine has only been around for less than two years. In fact how reliable is any of this information including the website itself. Could you provide your reaction to each of these three concerns. Thanks.

Q: I own small positions in both companies: ARM and NVDA, and I am in the green on both...

- I like them both...

- Please add 2 cent comments on both...

- Would you Add to Both or Just One at this point...Or??

Thanks,
M

Q: this company seems to be winning awards and new business , but very volatile.
does the future look brighter ?

Q: is this company worth hanging on to ?

Q: does the future look positive for this company ?

Q: Has Microsoft become a company that is Too Big To Fail?
- They have so many tentacles that seem attractive going forward...

- I own a small position, but want to Add more...

What do you see as Potential problems going forward, If Any...Other than normal market blips...

Thanks,
M

Q: As a follow up to my previous question on OTEX, I would also ask that you comment on analysts downgrades related to OTEX moving towards organic growth and away from growth by acquisition. Isn’t this simply a function of its low stock price relative to earnings and cash flow? If a growth-by acquisition company like CSU bought OTEX then it would be immediately accretive to earnings because CSU trading at a high PE multiple. The same analysts would applaud CSU for its ability to grow by acquisition and call the stock a buy. I am not saying that CSU is a bad company, far from it, but I am wondering if analysts would better serve investors by focusing more on the organic growth of a company and not on what it might acquire in the future.