Q: Hi 5i Team,
I came across an article this weekend about the "Rule of 40" and how it is evolving. It states that companies exceeding the Rule of 40 by 10 or more points (achieving a score of 50 or higher) see their revenue multiples increase by approximately 2.2X, and smart money is now favouring companies that balance growth with profitability, rather than just pursuing high growth at any cost.
I'm curious about Canadian and U.S. companies that achieve a Rule of 40 score of around 50 or better, meaning their revenue growth plus profit margin adds up to 50% or more. For example, a company growing at 20% with 30% margins, or one with 25% growth and 25% margins.
- Can you recommend any companies that fit this profile?
- Any Canadian companies that might be flying under the radar.
- Any mid/small-cap U.S. companies that meet this criteria.
Do you think this makes sense as a screening criterion for identifying quality growth stocks? If not, what is lacking?
Best,
Matt
I came across an article this weekend about the "Rule of 40" and how it is evolving. It states that companies exceeding the Rule of 40 by 10 or more points (achieving a score of 50 or higher) see their revenue multiples increase by approximately 2.2X, and smart money is now favouring companies that balance growth with profitability, rather than just pursuing high growth at any cost.
I'm curious about Canadian and U.S. companies that achieve a Rule of 40 score of around 50 or better, meaning their revenue growth plus profit margin adds up to 50% or more. For example, a company growing at 20% with 30% margins, or one with 25% growth and 25% margins.
- Can you recommend any companies that fit this profile?
- Any Canadian companies that might be flying under the radar.
- Any mid/small-cap U.S. companies that meet this criteria.
Do you think this makes sense as a screening criterion for identifying quality growth stocks? If not, what is lacking?
Best,
Matt