Q: Even though I'm approaching my 81st birthday, I am not, nor have I ever been a fan of the old balanced approach to portfolio composition, although I am quite aware that circumstances for some people may make that approach desirable. Just because I'm old doesn't mean I want bonds (which I don't really understand anyway).
I just spend a half hour comparing your three portfolios and my opinion has been justified in spades. I looked at the 3 year annualized performance, the maximum drawdown, profitable periods, losing periods and the up standard deviation.
The standard deviation for the BE portfolio is higher than the Income portfolio but that's the only metric that I would consider positive. The 3 year annualized performance of the BE is 12.95% vs. 4.51% for the income but most alarming was the maximum drawdown; that's the metric I thought the income portfolio investor would be looking for, that is a minimum drawdown. But the maximum drawdown for the BE is 6.8% compared to that of the income portfolio of 8.59%.
Okay, so here are my questions: Am I wrong in my all equities portfolio even at my age? Am I missing something in my interpretation of the results? And, why would anybody want to go income given the superior numbers of the balanced equity?
I just spend a half hour comparing your three portfolios and my opinion has been justified in spades. I looked at the 3 year annualized performance, the maximum drawdown, profitable periods, losing periods and the up standard deviation.
The standard deviation for the BE portfolio is higher than the Income portfolio but that's the only metric that I would consider positive. The 3 year annualized performance of the BE is 12.95% vs. 4.51% for the income but most alarming was the maximum drawdown; that's the metric I thought the income portfolio investor would be looking for, that is a minimum drawdown. But the maximum drawdown for the BE is 6.8% compared to that of the income portfolio of 8.59%.
Okay, so here are my questions: Am I wrong in my all equities portfolio even at my age? Am I missing something in my interpretation of the results? And, why would anybody want to go income given the superior numbers of the balanced equity?