Q: I have questions about the recent acquisition and stock offering for Milestone, one of my largest holdings.
1. They did not mention whether the acquisition is accretive - is it accretive?
2. Why would they sell about 185 M worth of stock for a 242M property, especially since they are also disposing of another property?
3. They say the NAV of properties will increase by a net amount of about 300 M, yet the cost of the property is 242M (and recall that this includes a disposition of one property) - isn't it a bit hard to b believe that they got a 300 M property for 242M? Is this possible? Or are they playing with the numbers?
1. They did not mention whether the acquisition is accretive - is it accretive?
2. Why would they sell about 185 M worth of stock for a 242M property, especially since they are also disposing of another property?
3. They say the NAV of properties will increase by a net amount of about 300 M, yet the cost of the property is 242M (and recall that this includes a disposition of one property) - isn't it a bit hard to b believe that they got a 300 M property for 242M? Is this possible? Or are they playing with the numbers?