Q: Further to your reply to Andrew, it would seem that the continued distribution is reliant on the volatility of its marijuana stock holdings, and particularly the market’s opinion of the overvaluation of the holdings.
I would assume that the unit value is similarly based on that assumption. That is to say that this fund’s purpose and value is as a shorter.
Is this a reasonable analysis? Why would I want to invest here and pay the 0.75% fee, as opposed to shorting the holdings directly?
I would assume that the unit value is similarly based on that assumption. That is to say that this fund’s purpose and value is as a shorter.
Is this a reasonable analysis? Why would I want to invest here and pay the 0.75% fee, as opposed to shorting the holdings directly?