skip to content
  1. Home
  2. >
  3. Investment Q&A
You can view 3 more answers this month. Sign up for a free trial for unlimited access.

Investment Q&A

Not investment advice or solicitation to buy/sell securities. Do your own due diligence and/or consult an advisor.

Q: Hello Peter,
I hold a balanced total portfolio across my TFSA, RRSP and non-registered accounts. I keep my highest dividend payers in my non-registered and currently have them on DRIPs. Are there any of theese that you don't think should be on DRIP because they are too risky?

ALA, KWH.UN, FTS, BNS, SLF, GS, NWH.UN, ECI, EIF, BCE
Read Answer Asked by Pamela on December 07, 2017
Q: Hi Peter and Team,

In our combined portfolio, we hold the following Industrials: BAD, EIF, KBL, NFI, SIS, and STN. In this group, we're frustrated with EIF and are just breaking when considering its healthy dividend. I like your idea of "forever" stocks and note that CNR is your pick in this sector. My questions are: Given that all of the above (with the exception of EIF) are performing well, would you be OK with replacing EIF with CNR, or perhaps you have a better suggestion? Are there too many Industrials in our portfolio and is it time to exit one or more of the group?

As always, your advice is greatly appreciated and valued.
Read Answer Asked by Jerry on October 13, 2017
Q: AD seems to be on a continual downhill slide. I am contemplating selling it in my RRSP and replacing it with 50:50 EIF and KWH.UN for income and more optimistic growth potential. Your opinion is appreciated. Joe
Read Answer Asked by Joseph on September 01, 2017
Q: Good morning.

I'm not a fan of short sellers but, with EIF, they may have a point on the cash flow. Looking back at the last 5 years (Morningstar.ca), it does seem that they are consistently showing negative free cash flow and this seems to be primarily due to investing in PP&E rather than acquisitions. If it was for acquisitions, I would view it more positively but for PP&E, every year, not so much. What is your opinion?
Read Answer Asked by Peter on July 24, 2017
Q: More of a comment than a question.
I sold half of my EIF holdings several years ago when there was a similar short attack which proved to be unfounded and also demonstrated that EIF management is actually very capable. The stock more than doubled after that, but is tumbling again not because it is a badly-run company but because it is small enough to be vulnerable to a short. I've come to the conclusion that these short attacks set up an irresistable negative psychology and a well-funded and clever shorter is probably unstoppable at least in the near to medium term. As a general rule it seems to me better to sell very early in this situation. Appreciate your thoughts
Read Answer Asked by richard on July 24, 2017
Looking for more? Sign up for a FREE 14 day trial! No credit card required

We invite you to sign up for a 14 day free trial of 5i Research!
Experience all the benefits and tools we have to offer; stock research, model portfolios, Q&A with our experts, and so much more. Join a community of like-minded investors today!