skip to content
  1. Home
  2. >
  3. Investment Q&A
You can view 3 more answers this month. Sign up for a free trial for unlimited access.

Investment Q&A

Not investment advice or solicitation to buy/sell securities. Do your own due diligence and/or consult an advisor.

Q: Hi Peter, Ryan, and Team, I need to top up my consumer discretionary holdings and already have close to full positions in the above stocks. Please recommend several possible purchases, or are there any of the stocks I already hold that could be overweight by a bit (excluding XTC)? Alternatively, since I don't have much US exposure, might there be a suitable ETF with decent growth? Thanks in advance.
Read Answer Asked by Jerry on December 05, 2016
Q: I have to reduce my C. Disc. sector; which one of the above would you let go? Great service! Thanks, Stephen
Read Answer Asked by stephen on October 07, 2016
Q: I am scratching my head on the consumer discretionary sector. Although the trends seem favourable, I am just not thrilled with what I see available out there. One name that intrigues me is PVH. It avoids the potential pitfalls of brick and mortar stores and seems fairly cheap on a valuation basis. Do you agree with the latter and can I have your general thoughts on PVH?. Or is some name in the sector that you find compelling? Thank-you.
Read Answer Asked by Alex on September 19, 2016
Q: Hi Peter and Ryan, What would be an appropriate Weighted Average Cost of Capital (WACC) to use to discount GIL's future free cash flows to firm? I am getting a very low WACC estimate of only 4.41% primarily because GIL's Beta is only 0.39. My other assumptions are as follows,

Risk free rate 2.4%
Market risk premium 5.75%
Beta 0.39
2.4% + (5.75% * 0.39) = 4.64%
Resulting cost of Equity 4.64%
Equity weighting 92.1%
After-tax cost of debt 1.7%
Debt weighting 7.9%
(4.64% * 0.921) + (1.7% * 0.079) = 4.41%
Resulting WACC 4.41%

To me WACC of only 4.41% seems too low. Where do I go wrong with above calculation?
Read Answer Asked by RAJITH on November 18, 2015
Q: Your research report on Gildan states

"Gildan has significant exposure to cotton prices, which can have a big
impact on the bottom line. The company says fluctuations and volatility
in the price of cotton and polyester fibres is a big risk."

Is there any reason the company would not hedge these risks through cotton futures or even oil futures (for the polyester price risk)? It seems to me that this is exactly why these futures exist, to serve the producers and smooth their earnings cycles. Thanks, J.
Read Answer Asked by Jeff on October 26, 2015