Q: Comments in a Globe article this morning:
The valuation retreated to 7.3 before the government issued its final decision and has since fallen even more with Thursday’s selloff. But some analysts believe that if Aecon’s EV/EBITDA multiple, based on estimates for 2019 earnings, stays in line with its peers in the construction sector, the shares should be worth considerably more.
The logic of the company being worth $20+ if the Chinese were willing to pay it then and the backlog has improved makes sense to me. Do you agree and is it an attractive buy given the huge drop?
The valuation retreated to 7.3 before the government issued its final decision and has since fallen even more with Thursday’s selloff. But some analysts believe that if Aecon’s EV/EBITDA multiple, based on estimates for 2019 earnings, stays in line with its peers in the construction sector, the shares should be worth considerably more.
The logic of the company being worth $20+ if the Chinese were willing to pay it then and the backlog has improved makes sense to me. Do you agree and is it an attractive buy given the huge drop?