Q: Good Afternoon: My question is really currency related rather than Visa specifically. I own a few US stocks including Visa which fortunately for me I purchased when there was not as much difference between the US and Canadian dollar. As a result of stock performance and the difference in currency valuation I have done well. I would like to make a few more US purchases but cant make myself do so with the almost 40% hit. In my opinion some time in the future our dollar will get stronger. Do you have any suggestions or can you recommend Canadian companies or ETF's that I can buy without being so concerned about the currency. Thank You.
You can view 3 more answers this month. Sign up for a free trial for unlimited access.
Investment Q&A
Not investment advice or solicitation to buy/sell securities. Do your own due diligence and/or consult an advisor.
Q: Hi,
I have just started investing and making my own portfolio this year. I selected a few core stocks to begin with and have been slowly adding positions in other stocks for diversity. As such my weightings range from 3 to 10%. Over the last couple of months about half of my stocks have dropped 10 to 30%. My question is, going forward is it better to continue adding new positions or adding to stocks I currently own at their lower values?
I like the names of the stocks I own. Diversification is ok but not properly weighted.
Thanks again for the advice.
Paul
I have just started investing and making my own portfolio this year. I selected a few core stocks to begin with and have been slowly adding positions in other stocks for diversity. As such my weightings range from 3 to 10%. Over the last couple of months about half of my stocks have dropped 10 to 30%. My question is, going forward is it better to continue adding new positions or adding to stocks I currently own at their lower values?
I like the names of the stocks I own. Diversification is ok but not properly weighted.
Thanks again for the advice.
Paul
Q: When the market was doing well, all the analysts were positive on the future of stocks. Now that there have been some stumbles, the bears seem to be coming out of the woods. They say that quantitative easing and a zero interest rate policy has created a stock market bubble by forcing yield investors to switch from bonds to dividend paying stocks. I even heard one analyst on BNN say that this feels like the tech bubble of the late 1990's. I don't really feel that multiples are stretched. Although some high yielding dividend stocks are trading at higher multiples than 10 years ago when interest rates were "normal" and some high growth stocks are trading at rich multiples, overall the market does not seem over valued. Of course, if we see double digit inflation and much higher interest rates, then I would expect a significant pullback. Otherwise, the market feels like it has room to grow. I would appreciate your thoughts.
Thanks,
Thanks,
Q: Can you explain why U.S. preferred share ETFs like PGF and PFF have considerably outperformed their Canadian counterparts such as CPD and ZPR ? Thanks, Joe
Q: Maybe this is not an easy question to answer, but when you say a particular stock is cheap or very cheap how do you determine this? Also, how would you determine if a stock is cheap AND high quality? Thanks!
Q: this question is about rebalancing for "balanced positions" and those for "small cap growth positions" within an overall portfolio.
for example, ATD.B in the balanced portion of the overall portfolio now has a market value of about $25,000 or 5% of the overall portfolio.
as it understand the i5R investment approach, when it reachs 7%, then I would sell some ATD.B share to get back to a 5% weight, right?!
now for the small cap growth positions…..with the position cost being $2,500…..or about 0.5% of the overall portfolio,
what is the rebalancing rule of thumb?……..do I hold until a small cap growth stock gets to $25,000, or to some lesser amount that is less than the 7% of the overall portfolio???
for example, ATD.B in the balanced portion of the overall portfolio now has a market value of about $25,000 or 5% of the overall portfolio.
as it understand the i5R investment approach, when it reachs 7%, then I would sell some ATD.B share to get back to a 5% weight, right?!
now for the small cap growth positions…..with the position cost being $2,500…..or about 0.5% of the overall portfolio,
what is the rebalancing rule of thumb?……..do I hold until a small cap growth stock gets to $25,000, or to some lesser amount that is less than the 7% of the overall portfolio???
Q: Hi folks: How will gold and silver react if (when) the bond market crashes?
Q: I hold some XHY in my margin and TFSA. The Canadian dollar has come down since I purchased about 2 months ago. The prediction is for a lower dollar. How risky is this downward slide , should I sell now? I just bought for the increased yield.Thank you,Phyl
Q: Is it possible that the recent weakness in gaming stocks is partly the result of the U.S Gov. position on Fan Duel and Draft Kings . If the Gov. action is succesfull it will mean the end of these two large companies and probably the end of the Fantasy Sport business in the U.S. More than 5,000000 people play this daily in the U.S and there is billions in revenue at stake. What do you think?
Q: Is FTS at any risk as far as being coal-dependant ?
Thanks for your help.
Sam
Thanks for your help.
Sam
Q: Hello Peter & 5i team,
So far so good in 2015, even though it was a tough year ; the equities (all canadian) I own have generated a 12.6% total return to Nov 20.
But these equities represent 82% of my RRIF portfolio ; this means that I’m sitting on 18% cash which I hesitate to redeploy.
You say that the US economy is pretty strong ; well, I’m not so sure about that. It is rather the best among a lousy bunch; in other words, in the kingdom of the blind, the one-eyed is king.
The S&P 500 rally is of low quality in terms of lack of breadth ; in 2015, its top 10 performing components represent over 100% of the total whereas that ratio was less than 20% in 2014 and slightly more that 10% in 2013. That’s a bad turn of situation.
The relative performance of the Russell 2000 vs the S&P 500 is in decline due to lack of liquidity in the small cap sector (which is the engine of growth). That’s no good either.
The Retail sector (consumer discretionary), which is a very important sector in the US economy, is dominated by only 3 names : Amazon, Netflix and Expedia. That’s hardly reassuring.
The US$ keeps gaining ground ; that causes enormous pressure on Emerging Markets debt and constitutes a substantial headwind on US multinationals profitability.
To top it all, the 2-year US yield is going up contributing to a flattening of the yield curve ; if (and its a big if) this situation perseveres for a few more months, we could face an economic downturn.
This is my rationale as to why I hesitate to redeploy my cash and look forward to your counter arguments,
Thanks as always,
Antoine
So far so good in 2015, even though it was a tough year ; the equities (all canadian) I own have generated a 12.6% total return to Nov 20.
But these equities represent 82% of my RRIF portfolio ; this means that I’m sitting on 18% cash which I hesitate to redeploy.
You say that the US economy is pretty strong ; well, I’m not so sure about that. It is rather the best among a lousy bunch; in other words, in the kingdom of the blind, the one-eyed is king.
The S&P 500 rally is of low quality in terms of lack of breadth ; in 2015, its top 10 performing components represent over 100% of the total whereas that ratio was less than 20% in 2014 and slightly more that 10% in 2013. That’s a bad turn of situation.
The relative performance of the Russell 2000 vs the S&P 500 is in decline due to lack of liquidity in the small cap sector (which is the engine of growth). That’s no good either.
The Retail sector (consumer discretionary), which is a very important sector in the US economy, is dominated by only 3 names : Amazon, Netflix and Expedia. That’s hardly reassuring.
The US$ keeps gaining ground ; that causes enormous pressure on Emerging Markets debt and constitutes a substantial headwind on US multinationals profitability.
To top it all, the 2-year US yield is going up contributing to a flattening of the yield curve ; if (and its a big if) this situation perseveres for a few more months, we could face an economic downturn.
This is my rationale as to why I hesitate to redeploy my cash and look forward to your counter arguments,
Thanks as always,
Antoine
Q: Hi 5i: The stock market situation has changed a lot since I last did any rebalancing. Could you therefore tell me what weights you would now recommend for the 10 TSX sectors. Also, what sectors would you assign to MAL and BOS which Morningstar calls Basic Materials, and to DRT which Morningstar calls Services. Many thanks.
Q: Good morning,
I currently hold SPY, VIG and IWO for US exposure in equal amounts representing 8% of my portfolio. Would you recommend switching to/ or adding to these the specific ETFs that you outlined for tech, consumer discretionary and industrial sectors? Also, what portfolio % might you aim for in US currently.
Thanks.
I currently hold SPY, VIG and IWO for US exposure in equal amounts representing 8% of my portfolio. Would you recommend switching to/ or adding to these the specific ETFs that you outlined for tech, consumer discretionary and industrial sectors? Also, what portfolio % might you aim for in US currently.
Thanks.
Q: Some guys in my stock group think oil is a real long term dud beause of American shale. The infer it is much worse than people suspect from the supply side, indicating the US has just scratched the surface on their ability to recover this cheap oil.If I heeded this news it would discourage me from ever buying any oil stock in the future since demand will never come close to making up for this new technology which is also allegedly being exported all over the world. Do you think this idea is over blown, for the short and long term
Q: I would like to add something I have learned since I have been with 5i for a couple of years now. I have learned an awful lot and no lesson has been more important than the need to diversify. Unfortunately, at first that simply meant to me holding companies in different sectors without enough regard for exactly where those companies earn their money. So when oil and commodities collapsed, not only did my purer plays (Tck, G, Sgy) drop but "associated" companies in other sectors declined as well (Rus, Bdi, Qst) so I realized I wasn't as diversified as I thought. Lesson learned.
All in all, I have been happy with my total returns over these past few short years. But I seemed to have achieved those returns by having some 2,3, and even 4 baggers while having lots of losers. Is this a "normal" situation or just a current sign of the times and the makeup of my porfolio? Is there a percentage of winners one should expect in a portfolio (assuming moderate risk)? Or will the losers often/usually outnumber the winners?
Appreciate your insight.
Paul F.
All in all, I have been happy with my total returns over these past few short years. But I seemed to have achieved those returns by having some 2,3, and even 4 baggers while having lots of losers. Is this a "normal" situation or just a current sign of the times and the makeup of my porfolio? Is there a percentage of winners one should expect in a portfolio (assuming moderate risk)? Or will the losers often/usually outnumber the winners?
Appreciate your insight.
Paul F.
Q: Please comment on where 5i stands as a whole in regards to the needs for pipelines and on the Fed environment department giving a green light to build an LNG plant on Lelu island (Petronas). In regards to pipelines, specifically on ‘Energy East’ and ‘Trans Mountain’. There certainly is a lot of red tape with the Fed/Prov, Environmentalists, FN’s, etc; but isn’t it time Canada “became whole” on important infrastructure (ie. pipelines/LNG) issues to move our “trapped” resource to tide water/abroad? 5i has a very savvy investor base, a moderated forum would be a good thing to “open the floor” so to speak to hear all views on a variety of issues...
Thanks and regards,
Evan
Thanks and regards,
Evan
Q: Good morning...was wondering if your read the article in Financial Post "How Canada is becoming the orphan equity market nobody wants"...would appreciate your thoughts...
Thanks
Thanks
Q: My biggest (>40%) on paper “losers” in a non-registered account are: SGY, TOU, PHM, SCL, and AVO. They are each between 1% and 2% of the portfolio.
My biggest (>100%) on paper “winners” are : CSU and ATD.B.
I don’t have any capital gains to offset this year since I have not sold anything. Does it make any sense to trigger a tax loss for the sake of it since it could be used in the future (and nothing to carry the loss back to either)? If I sold any of the above “losers” I probably would not be in any hurry to buy them back, if at all. I can hang onto them as I still kind of believe they are still good, but you refer to the opportunity cost of holding onto them. Not sure if I should create a loss for the sake of it, and maybe take some profits on the winners since they are up quite a bit.
Paul J.
My biggest (>100%) on paper “winners” are : CSU and ATD.B.
I don’t have any capital gains to offset this year since I have not sold anything. Does it make any sense to trigger a tax loss for the sake of it since it could be used in the future (and nothing to carry the loss back to either)? If I sold any of the above “losers” I probably would not be in any hurry to buy them back, if at all. I can hang onto them as I still kind of believe they are still good, but you refer to the opportunity cost of holding onto them. Not sure if I should create a loss for the sake of it, and maybe take some profits on the winners since they are up quite a bit.
Paul J.
Q: Terrorists attack on Paris is truly tragic. Sadly this may lead to market correction. In today's Globe and Mail (net edition) there is an article by Reuters' Journalists about the possible short term correction and a "short squeeze" taking place in the near term. They don't expect any long term consequences.
What is your opinion and suggestions regarding portfolio management? Buy on this dip or just leave things be and monitor the situation?
What is your opinion and suggestions regarding portfolio management? Buy on this dip or just leave things be and monitor the situation?
Q: I seem to be noticing a trend over the last few earning seasons (particularly this last quarter and in Canada). If a company’s earnings (and general outlook) surprise to the upside, the stock price may move up a bit but usually not by much. If earnings are in-line with consensus estimates, the stock price might just hold steady but more often drops anyway. If there is a small earnings miss the stock gets severely punished, and on a large miss the reaction is often brutal (i.e down 30%-50% in the following days ex. Amaya). The daily moves that some supposedly steady large cap names can encounter these days on a single piece of news is getting more and more exaggerated. It almost makes me believe that selling an entire portfolio before earnings season and buying back immediately after could make a lot of sense. The downside risk seems to be so much more amplified versus the upside potential when quarterly numbers are released. I would obviously never expect you to endorse such a timing strategy, so my question is simply: 1)Am I imagining this or have you noticed this trend? 2) If this is in fact the case, what are your thoughts on the reasons why and when /what might stop it? Is it just a function of current investor sentiment?