Q: Hi 5i team,
Thanks for all the help, much appreciated! My question is a general one based on your reply to an earlier question regarding dividend payers:
In a rising rate environment where rates hit, say, 4% and a stock pays the same; would not the dividend payer still be generally a preferred option due to the dividend tax credit as opposed to the 100% tax treatment on interest income? Shouldn't there be a built-in differential before a given interest rate would hurt a specific stock? So, if a stock pays 5.5% dividend and interest rates look to rise to 4.25%, why should that particularly hurt the higher paying dividend stock to the degree it likely would? While I recognize it is not as simplistic as I make out, I would think there would be a smidgin of validity to my argument.....
Thanks for all the help, much appreciated! My question is a general one based on your reply to an earlier question regarding dividend payers:
In a rising rate environment where rates hit, say, 4% and a stock pays the same; would not the dividend payer still be generally a preferred option due to the dividend tax credit as opposed to the 100% tax treatment on interest income? Shouldn't there be a built-in differential before a given interest rate would hurt a specific stock? So, if a stock pays 5.5% dividend and interest rates look to rise to 4.25%, why should that particularly hurt the higher paying dividend stock to the degree it likely would? While I recognize it is not as simplistic as I make out, I would think there would be a smidgin of validity to my argument.....