Q: I read on the FAQ's of an ETF Website the following question:
"Are an ETF's Assets Under Management and Trading Volume good indicators of liquidity".
The answer they gave was: "No. The most important aspect related to the liquidity of any ETF is that while the liquidity of the ETF itself (the ETF’s own trading volume on the exchange) may be deemed poor or limited, the key gauge of that ETF’s liquidity is the liquidity of its underlying exposure.
With the mechanism of creation and redemption of ETFs, a designated broker (DB) is responsible for ensuring that market prices track the ETFs’ net asset value (NAVs). If the underlying securities can be easily bought and sold, a tight fit between price and NAV is easily maintained.
Hence, an ETF with small AUM and little trading volume can still be highly liquid if its underlying basket of securities is liquid."
Is this essentially correct, and if it is I'm still not sure how this would work? I have avoided many ETF's for what appears to be poor liquidity and trading volume. If I want to sell an ETF and level 2 quotes show a large spread to sell for example 1000 shares, will additional shares in the ETF somehow be created to get a fair market price based on the underlying stocks held in that ETF if I put a Sell order in on what appears to be a low volume ETF? What I am getting at basically is - is there any way of knowing what the price spread will be on the sale if additional ETF units that are created "on the fly" by the DB? I may not be interpreting the answer given above so please try to expand and clarify their explanation.
Thank you.
Q: Which do you think would be the better investment as far as growth and stability (and yes, I know they're often mutually exclusive desires). I already hold WC in a US account and was considering buying more, but would I be better off with WM?
Q: Could you please comment on Pho's preliminary numbers and reasoning why they would post unofficial results? Is it an affirmation of guidance?
Thank you
Q: You hafe mnd as one of your favorite goldcompanies.lately the marketcap has halved in a couple of months.
Their results were not great.
Is there hope of revival for this company and how would this happen?
The way the shareprice is going it looks like they are going bancrupt.
Do you still believe in this company?
Q: I was wondering about mandalay I have owned this stock for years. now they have lowered their assets . don't they also acquire assets. should I get out or is that a panic move. thanks bill
Q: I subscribe to StockCharts.com Do you know of any similar type of charting service or website where it is possible to chart Canadian MARKET CAPITALIZATION changes over time?
Thanks for what you are doing in the small cap niche. Interesting too how trading volumes react as various market cap thresholds are achieved.
I know you mentioned on one of your previous webcasts but could you indicate again what market cap value thresholds are significant when it comes to potential formal institutional coverage as well as fund purchase eligibility.
Q: On Friday there was a question to the effect of is EMP.A about to turn around. I live in a Vancouver suburb and the Safeway store anchors a small neighbourhood mall which became a no go zone for many in the community after Empire took over the operations. I sit on a local community board and we were concerned because the usual patrons had given up - shelves not stocked, disorganized displays, poorly trained staff etc etc. However, very recently things have markedly improved. My wife, who had given up on the store, came home yesterday and said it was the first time ever thatthe parking lot was full. I go in occasionally and it is better, in fact it is now a better operation than under Safeway. I would say it is a good time to look at the stock.
Phil
Q: MDA has dropped a lot in the last few days due to a takeover that has not been well received by the market. Is it time to sell MDA and move on, or is the drop overblown and time to add to an existing position?
Although much much smaller than MDA, what is your opinion of MAL as an investment in the aero and defence sector.
Q: Peter, can you kindly suggest five investments that typically pay no dividend or other distribution (tax minimization). This would ideally be for a 5-10 year+ holding. My risk tolerance is medium-to-high (but just short of 'stupid'). If one or two of these suggestions were US companies (other than Alphabet; already owned), that would be fine. Thanks as always!
Q: Hi 5i,
Looking to add a specialty pharmaceutical with growth potential in a TFSA. Willing to wait for the growth and am comfortable with the risk. Morningstar rates both of these as 'undervalued' currently. Which do you prefer for future growth prospects? Thank-you.
Q: This note is for the team member who answered my question about ALA.R:
My good Sir, you have a fan for life. I asked my question in the middle of the night (by my calculation it would have been about 5.30am Eastern) and, after I sent it, I clicked back to the Q&A section - and there was my answer!!!! Speechless hardly describes my admiration for your work ethic.
Again, thank you for everything.
Q: Emotion aside about a stock everyone has loved to hate for over a year, PHM just reported their best positive cash flow results, have an astounding 78% profit margin, substantially reduced their bad debt to a manageable level, increased their cash balance from the previous quarter and reduced their overall debt. They say after 18 months of hard work, they have trimmed unprofitable business which has reduced revenues but are making more money and now seem ready to propel sales upward. It's very unfortunate they are splitting into two separate companies but when the leaders don't get along, it can be toxic. The same personnel have steered this turnaround so there is substantial commitment as each owns millions of shares. Can you see anything remotely positive in this effort? Two big concerns are the number of traders swarming this stock and it seems there may be a lot of shorts considering they have 375M shares and, second, do you foresee one or both new companies being taken private by the large share-positioned CEO's once the split is complete. Any insight would be appreciated. Thanks.