Q: Lost 54% of CRH investments since starting 3 months ago. Do you suggest to claim my losses or stay in. Where do you think this is going?
You can view 3 more answers this month. Sign up for a free trial for unlimited access.
Investment Q&A
Not investment advice or solicitation to buy/sell securities. Do your own due diligence and/or consult an advisor.
Q: hi folks:
I am curious as to your understanding of the passage below
(excerpted from stockhouse BB's)
is there a better than even chance that CRH is yet another company being brought to earth by 'creative' accounting or is everything simply been overblown?
thanks in advance
CRH'S CONFUSING ACCOUNTING? Help needed to understand this.
CRH has a unique acquisition model in that the company tends to purchase portions of businesses (typically 51%, sometimes more), recording 100% of the acquired business revenues and earnings on its consolidated financial statements with adjustments made for specific amounts attributable to shareholders and attributable to non-controlling interests. This acquisition practice, while compliant with GAAP and sound from an accounting standpoint, requires that investors pay more attention to the details within the company's financials to get a complete picture of what is going on.
The company's most recent financial statements show a quarterly net and comprehensive income increase of 9% year over year from $3.03 million in Q1 2016 to $3.3 million in Q1 2017. The breakdown of these earnings is where investors need to pay attention.
In Q1 2016, CRH reported that net income attributable to shareholders was $2.96 million (or 97.7% of total earnings).
In Q1 2017, CRH reported that net income attributable to shareholders was $1.54 million (or only 46.7% of total earnings).
Because of the company's acquisition model, stock-based compensation, and increases in finance-related costs, CRH is now paying out more than half of its earnings to non-controlling interests. This is a trend which has been ongoing for the past year with the shareholders portion of earnings consistently declining over time.
Looking at earnings per share (EPS), we can see that earnings have significantly underperformed expectations ($0.02 EPS attributable to shareholders compared to $0.07 EPS expected.
Consider this note from the most recent financial statements: The company has also stated its intention to acquire or develop additional GI anesthesia businesses. In the future, it may be necessary for the Company to raise additional funds for the continuing development of its business plan, including additional acquisitions.
Insiders selling large amounts of stock of late CRH directors David Johnson and Edward Wright sold a combined $5.71 million of stock at average prices between $7.45 and $11.05 in March, which amounts to nearly 1% of CRHs total float. As I have reported previously, insider selling is generally not an issue in large and very liquid equities with compensation structures reliant on stock options. In growth-related businesses, large stock option redemptions can be commonplace and may largely be ignored by the financial markets for those reasons. That said, any time nearly 1% of a company's stock is sold by insiders, questions undoubtedly come to mind.
Bottom line I am skeptical about CRHs growth strategy from the standpoint of a shareholder. It appears to me that the substantial dilution effect resulting from this growth strategy is one which will not benefit shareholders in the long run. My skepticism also extends to the recent large liquidation of stock by two company directors, making me more uneasy about this company's long-term prospects.
I am curious as to your understanding of the passage below
(excerpted from stockhouse BB's)
is there a better than even chance that CRH is yet another company being brought to earth by 'creative' accounting or is everything simply been overblown?
thanks in advance
CRH'S CONFUSING ACCOUNTING? Help needed to understand this.
CRH has a unique acquisition model in that the company tends to purchase portions of businesses (typically 51%, sometimes more), recording 100% of the acquired business revenues and earnings on its consolidated financial statements with adjustments made for specific amounts attributable to shareholders and attributable to non-controlling interests. This acquisition practice, while compliant with GAAP and sound from an accounting standpoint, requires that investors pay more attention to the details within the company's financials to get a complete picture of what is going on.
The company's most recent financial statements show a quarterly net and comprehensive income increase of 9% year over year from $3.03 million in Q1 2016 to $3.3 million in Q1 2017. The breakdown of these earnings is where investors need to pay attention.
In Q1 2016, CRH reported that net income attributable to shareholders was $2.96 million (or 97.7% of total earnings).
In Q1 2017, CRH reported that net income attributable to shareholders was $1.54 million (or only 46.7% of total earnings).
Because of the company's acquisition model, stock-based compensation, and increases in finance-related costs, CRH is now paying out more than half of its earnings to non-controlling interests. This is a trend which has been ongoing for the past year with the shareholders portion of earnings consistently declining over time.
Looking at earnings per share (EPS), we can see that earnings have significantly underperformed expectations ($0.02 EPS attributable to shareholders compared to $0.07 EPS expected.
Consider this note from the most recent financial statements: The company has also stated its intention to acquire or develop additional GI anesthesia businesses. In the future, it may be necessary for the Company to raise additional funds for the continuing development of its business plan, including additional acquisitions.
Insiders selling large amounts of stock of late CRH directors David Johnson and Edward Wright sold a combined $5.71 million of stock at average prices between $7.45 and $11.05 in March, which amounts to nearly 1% of CRHs total float. As I have reported previously, insider selling is generally not an issue in large and very liquid equities with compensation structures reliant on stock options. In growth-related businesses, large stock option redemptions can be commonplace and may largely be ignored by the financial markets for those reasons. That said, any time nearly 1% of a company's stock is sold by insiders, questions undoubtedly come to mind.
Bottom line I am skeptical about CRHs growth strategy from the standpoint of a shareholder. It appears to me that the substantial dilution effect resulting from this growth strategy is one which will not benefit shareholders in the long run. My skepticism also extends to the recent large liquidation of stock by two company directors, making me more uneasy about this company's long-term prospects.
Q: In answer to Febin's question on Friday you said that "The stock reaction (crh) is likely appropriate, though, putting its risk/reward in line: thus we would do nothing here". How did you determine the risk/reward of Crh? What metrics/rational did you apply? I'm currently down 48% on a 1/2 position and appreciate your response. Thankyou.
Q: Getting pretty discouraged with the slide in CRH. Your advice...hang on? Buy more? Thx
Q: Hi folks:
My average cost for this is in the 7 dollar range. I held it up to 12 and now its going to south to fast for my liking. I bought this for a 3 to 5 year hold. A 27 percent decline in one day certainly can put investors in panic mode, and I need your humble professional opinion with what to do with this one. Is patience the key here or should I move the remaining capital to a knight or a Savaria for example.
Thank you for your professional advice.
My average cost for this is in the 7 dollar range. I held it up to 12 and now its going to south to fast for my liking. I bought this for a 3 to 5 year hold. A 27 percent decline in one day certainly can put investors in panic mode, and I need your humble professional opinion with what to do with this one. Is patience the key here or should I move the remaining capital to a knight or a Savaria for example.
Thank you for your professional advice.
Q: Hi Peter and Team,
Is it CRH oversold at $4.7 level? If new billing code adopted, what is CRH worth?
Thanks
Is it CRH oversold at $4.7 level? If new billing code adopted, what is CRH worth?
Thanks
Q: CRH Medical dropped >28% on Friday. I see they repaid their loan to Crown Capital as planned and have taken out a new credit facility (to 2020), reducing their interest expenses from 12% to 2.5% and providing cheaper capital for a future acquisition (3.5%), http://investors.crhsystem.com/1881-2/.
This would seem to be a big positive - quite apart from the recent re-imbursement issue which doesn't seem to realistically reflect the actual impact of any changes (i.e. is more benign than the market has anticipated).
So why the 28% drop? I got in at $4.47 - your advice, please? I'm tempted to buy more but I am/ should be an income investor (ha!).
Thanks as always,
Heather
This would seem to be a big positive - quite apart from the recent re-imbursement issue which doesn't seem to realistically reflect the actual impact of any changes (i.e. is more benign than the market has anticipated).
So why the 28% drop? I got in at $4.47 - your advice, please? I'm tempted to buy more but I am/ should be an income investor (ha!).
Thanks as always,
Heather
Q: Do you know if the Mawer New Canada Fund sold a significant part or all of its position in CRH ? If so, when did they do it ? Also when will the decision on the new reimbursement rates be final ?
Q: TD Waterhouse Action Notes Summary Report dated July 7 2017 about "Questions regarding the sustainability of CRH's reimbursement rates have contributed to a two month slide in CRH's stock."
Here's the meat of it.
" We expect a relatively benign outcome to the 2018 fee schedule, partly because of CRH's limited exposure to CMS funding. Our sensitivity analysis indicates that a 5% cut in the Medicare reimbursement fee could cost CRH ~1% in adjusted EBITDA. ....
CRH has limited exposure to MEDICARE- We expect CRH's operating performance to be largely insulated from CMS for two reasons. First, Medicare only represents 10 to 15 % of CRH's revenues. Second, CRH's dominant payers (the private insurers) employ different reimbursement protocols from Medicare. We estimate that commercial payers reimburse the 00810 code at 3X-4X the rate of government payers.
TD Investment Conclusion
We are maintaining our buy rating but reducing our target price to $10.50 (was $12).
Our rating is based on three considerations: 1) leadership in a defensive, growing segment of the U.S. healthcare services market: 2) high margin cash flow streams and: 3) expansion opportunities within CRH's core anesthesiology market.
Hope this soothes a bit!
Here's the meat of it.
" We expect a relatively benign outcome to the 2018 fee schedule, partly because of CRH's limited exposure to CMS funding. Our sensitivity analysis indicates that a 5% cut in the Medicare reimbursement fee could cost CRH ~1% in adjusted EBITDA. ....
CRH has limited exposure to MEDICARE- We expect CRH's operating performance to be largely insulated from CMS for two reasons. First, Medicare only represents 10 to 15 % of CRH's revenues. Second, CRH's dominant payers (the private insurers) employ different reimbursement protocols from Medicare. We estimate that commercial payers reimburse the 00810 code at 3X-4X the rate of government payers.
TD Investment Conclusion
We are maintaining our buy rating but reducing our target price to $10.50 (was $12).
Our rating is based on three considerations: 1) leadership in a defensive, growing segment of the U.S. healthcare services market: 2) high margin cash flow streams and: 3) expansion opportunities within CRH's core anesthesiology market.
Hope this soothes a bit!
Q: Please comment on the release of 2018 CMS reimbursement rate and its impact on CRH going forward.
FJ
FJ
Q: Hi there
Any ideas for the big drop in CRH Medical today.
Much thanks
Stuart
Any ideas for the big drop in CRH Medical today.
Much thanks
Stuart
Q: CRH is getting hit hard this morning. Why ? Is it our Short Sellor again ? RAK
Q: I own a fair bit of PHM, mentioned in a past comment, bought at 15 cents.
I noticed today that the debenture below just hit 52wh.
Patient Home Monitoring
PHM.DB-X
85.00 / 57.50
Question: if I want to add to my position, would the debenture be a better option or should I stick simply to the stock.
Thanks,
CDJ
I noticed today that the debenture below just hit 52wh.
Patient Home Monitoring
PHM.DB-X
85.00 / 57.50
Question: if I want to add to my position, would the debenture be a better option or should I stick simply to the stock.
Thanks,
CDJ
Q: I'm currently down 50% on a small position. Is this worth hanging on to? Has it found a bottom? Thanks.
Q: Which of these two US healthcare stocks would you prefer for growth potential for a moderate to high risk investor?
Q: Do you still recommend holding onto this position? I have watched it fall by about 50% and it looks like it wants to drop further.
-
Bristol-Myers Squibb Company (BMY $47.92)
-
Knight Therapeutics Inc. (GUD $6.45)
-
iShares U.S. Medical Devices ETF (IHI $62.87)
Q: I have an average price on BMY shares of $69 having bought near peak price...when the recommendations by other analysts ( not 5i) were extremely positive. After, the company missed expectations with a drug and the downfall began. Now, I am wondering, what factors would you consider in making the decision whether to exit this losing trade and put the $$ into an alternate pharm company such as GUD or an ETF such as some you have recently mentioned IHI.
Q: I have purchased 2500 shares of PLI over the year at varying prices from 2.40 to 1.60. At 1.50 today would this be a good opportunity to average down and buy more. Your opinion is much appreciated.
Q: CIBC has issued a downgrade on PLI reducing their target price from $4.40 to $2.15. I don not usually pay any attention to target prices but this seems to be a significant cut. They also mention cash burn rate and that the company will likely need additional financing.
Would appreciate your views on this. Thanks John
Would appreciate your views on this. Thanks John
-
Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc (TMO $499.99)
-
iShares Global Healthcare ETF (IXJ $88.31)
-
iShares U.S. Medical Devices ETF (IHI $62.87)
Q: I would like to invest n the US healthcare and have been recommended to invest in TMO but since this Would be the only stock in the healthcare that I would invest in I think it might be better to invest in a healthcare ETF and have found IXJ and IHI and wonder if better to invest in an ETF or ok just to invest in one US healthcare stock? If an ETF which one would you prefer?
Thanks
Thanks