Q: I was interested in Paul's question about allocation changes based on exchange and it raised a question in my mind about what has become my biggest holding.
This is an RSP account with 20 equities so the allocation should be in the 5% region.
This stock has grown to the 10% region.
Now according to normal allocations I believe that I should take the profits and bring it back to the 5% area.
This particular stock has been sold down to the point that it is, for argument's sake, free. It has appreciated 300% since it was added to the portfolio and allocations were reduced.
The other point is that divided wise it is paying a 7% dividend at current pricing but at my cost the yield is much greater.
So solid stock that has grown does the allocation become less important or should still be followed and a solid performer sold to bring allocations back in line?
I have experienced where extraordinary events have cost me money due to allocation, DH's short issue comes to mind.
Some additional information is that I am 65 and sort of retired.
Thanks,
Ken
This is an RSP account with 20 equities so the allocation should be in the 5% region.
This stock has grown to the 10% region.
Now according to normal allocations I believe that I should take the profits and bring it back to the 5% area.
This particular stock has been sold down to the point that it is, for argument's sake, free. It has appreciated 300% since it was added to the portfolio and allocations were reduced.
The other point is that divided wise it is paying a 7% dividend at current pricing but at my cost the yield is much greater.
So solid stock that has grown does the allocation become less important or should still be followed and a solid performer sold to bring allocations back in line?
I have experienced where extraordinary events have cost me money due to allocation, DH's short issue comes to mind.
Some additional information is that I am 65 and sort of retired.
Thanks,
Ken