Q: These questions are in regard to Peter’s comment today about maintaining a balanced (sector weighted) portfolio: 1. If one was starting fresh with a $1m equity portfolio, how many names would you choose if building a portfolio from the Summary List? Regardless of sector (next question), would they all be equal weight by name?
2. I see that you have applied 14 sectors to your summary names – 4 more than the TSX/S&P breakdowns (Services, Industrial Goods, Financial Services and Consumer Goods seem to be adjuncts to the usual 10). In determining sector weighting of the portfolio, would you choose names so that all 14 sectors were of equal weight (i.e. 7% each)? If so, how far would you let a sector run before re-balancing?
3. If one decided to follow your Balanced Portfolio, would you buy all 27 of your current names? Would they be all equal weight or at the current weights in your portfolio?
4. What would be the highest percentage for a single name to run before re-balancing?
I realize sector/stock weighting cannot be made into a science, but I’m just trying to get a toehold conceptually. Thanks a lot.
2. I see that you have applied 14 sectors to your summary names – 4 more than the TSX/S&P breakdowns (Services, Industrial Goods, Financial Services and Consumer Goods seem to be adjuncts to the usual 10). In determining sector weighting of the portfolio, would you choose names so that all 14 sectors were of equal weight (i.e. 7% each)? If so, how far would you let a sector run before re-balancing?
3. If one decided to follow your Balanced Portfolio, would you buy all 27 of your current names? Would they be all equal weight or at the current weights in your portfolio?
4. What would be the highest percentage for a single name to run before re-balancing?
I realize sector/stock weighting cannot be made into a science, but I’m just trying to get a toehold conceptually. Thanks a lot.