Q: I find AGT interesting and have done some basic research. I had looked at it a few years ago when they were starting out. In hindsight it would have been a very good investment. That said you can’t buy much Beer with hindsight.
Since I first looked at it the growth has been very impressive and they have diversified into “Value Added” products.
I understand that Agricultural Commodities have a lot of risk and the Food Product business is very competitive.
That said it appears that AGT has found a “niche” that they understand very well.
I noticed that at one point that “The Carme Trust” controlled by Murad Al-Katib owned 26% of the company. In January 2014 that was reduced to 16.7%. It’s considered a good thing if management has substantial “skin in the game” but too much control by the CEO can be a double edged sword.
I don’t know if the reduction in the family’s holdings and control should be considered negative, positive or irrelevant.
Over the last year or so the growth in the company and increase in the share price has been impressive.
Another thing that I noticed unless I missed something is that the over-allotment on the recent Bought Deal (Nov 2014) at $28 was not taken up. If that is a fact it could suggest that the market felt that $28 was a bit expensive.
I am considering starting a position in AGT with the view to build it over the next few months depending on how things go for a mid or better yet long term investment.
The only other exposure that I have to Agriculture / Food is Agrium (AGU) and Premium Brands (PBH)
Your thoughts?
Since I first looked at it the growth has been very impressive and they have diversified into “Value Added” products.
I understand that Agricultural Commodities have a lot of risk and the Food Product business is very competitive.
That said it appears that AGT has found a “niche” that they understand very well.
I noticed that at one point that “The Carme Trust” controlled by Murad Al-Katib owned 26% of the company. In January 2014 that was reduced to 16.7%. It’s considered a good thing if management has substantial “skin in the game” but too much control by the CEO can be a double edged sword.
I don’t know if the reduction in the family’s holdings and control should be considered negative, positive or irrelevant.
Over the last year or so the growth in the company and increase in the share price has been impressive.
Another thing that I noticed unless I missed something is that the over-allotment on the recent Bought Deal (Nov 2014) at $28 was not taken up. If that is a fact it could suggest that the market felt that $28 was a bit expensive.
I am considering starting a position in AGT with the view to build it over the next few months depending on how things go for a mid or better yet long term investment.
The only other exposure that I have to Agriculture / Food is Agrium (AGU) and Premium Brands (PBH)
Your thoughts?