Q: The recent question on BEP.UN caused me to check the Holy Grail of info for this stock, the Investor Relations pages of the company website, which is a far more accurate and often underutilized source than brokers or other services. Distributions, not dividends, of $.3625 US for the last 4 quarters totaled $1.45 US and with their stated goal (from the 2012 Annual Report) of 3 to 5% increase annually, it seems that the next distribution is in line for an increase (proposed record date March 31). All Brookfield companies, to my knowledge, report earnings in US $ and pay out in US $, and differences in currency translation could account for different reports in C$.
Also, as you summarized, in the "Highlights" discussion in the A.R. management states, "The primary reason for this {the reported IFRS net loss} is that we recognize a significantly higher level of depreciation for our assets than we are required to reinvest in the business as sustaining capital expenditures. As a result, we also measure our financial results based on Adjusted EBITDA, funds from operations and net asset value to provide readers with an assessment of the cash flow generated by our assets and the residual cash flow retained to fund distributions and growth initiatives."
When considering these other factors in the financial results, and that the company stated NAV per LPU of $32.35 US is far above the current market price, I understand why 5i recently added to its position in the model portfolio. If memory serves me, I believe it has traded much closer to NAV in years past, so it should be only a matter of time before patient investors are rewarded, while collecting 5.7% to wait. My question is about the discount to NAV: is 21% about normal at this time when comparing similar sized companies in its industry, such as Fortis or Emera? Thanks, J.
Also, as you summarized, in the "Highlights" discussion in the A.R. management states, "The primary reason for this {the reported IFRS net loss} is that we recognize a significantly higher level of depreciation for our assets than we are required to reinvest in the business as sustaining capital expenditures. As a result, we also measure our financial results based on Adjusted EBITDA, funds from operations and net asset value to provide readers with an assessment of the cash flow generated by our assets and the residual cash flow retained to fund distributions and growth initiatives."
When considering these other factors in the financial results, and that the company stated NAV per LPU of $32.35 US is far above the current market price, I understand why 5i recently added to its position in the model portfolio. If memory serves me, I believe it has traded much closer to NAV in years past, so it should be only a matter of time before patient investors are rewarded, while collecting 5.7% to wait. My question is about the discount to NAV: is 21% about normal at this time when comparing similar sized companies in its industry, such as Fortis or Emera? Thanks, J.
