Q: http://email.seekingalpha.com/track?type=click&mailingid=2725315&messageid=2800&databaseid=&serial=2800O2725315O1417550693.ee8baa118f6bde76b6a9a57f2d931657&emailid=1079842&userid=1079842&extra=&&&3000&&&http://seekingalpha.com/article/2725315-canadian-oil-sands-whats-it-worth?source=email_rt_article_readmore&uprof=46
Mr.Hodson, this is a follow-up to my recent questions on Canadian Oil Sands Ltd (COS). The market is currently doing a carnage on COS, but this paper puts things in a different perspective. See also comments by Uncle Pie, who owned COS for a long time. To what extent do you agree with the author and Uncle Pie ? Should you think this would be useful to other members, feel free to act accordingly and let them see your response. It just does not make sense to discard a company that had better days, and still might continue to do so in the future, while having a superior product (SCO or synthetic oil). Of course, the market is king, and should it decide to punish COS, just like other oil producers (with regular Canada crude), it might be better to acknowledge the market is always right. What's the correct view in such a case ?
Mr.Hodson, this is a follow-up to my recent questions on Canadian Oil Sands Ltd (COS). The market is currently doing a carnage on COS, but this paper puts things in a different perspective. See also comments by Uncle Pie, who owned COS for a long time. To what extent do you agree with the author and Uncle Pie ? Should you think this would be useful to other members, feel free to act accordingly and let them see your response. It just does not make sense to discard a company that had better days, and still might continue to do so in the future, while having a superior product (SCO or synthetic oil). Of course, the market is king, and should it decide to punish COS, just like other oil producers (with regular Canada crude), it might be better to acknowledge the market is always right. What's the correct view in such a case ?