Q: Gud seems to be drifting lower each day. Have you changed views on this name. I'm wondering if it might be a value trap.
You can view 3 more answers this month. Sign up for a free trial for unlimited access.
Investment Q&A
Not investment advice or solicitation to buy/sell securities. Do your own due diligence and/or consult an advisor.
Q: GUD. GUD is pretty cheap. Good time to increase the number of shares ?
-
BMO Equal Weight US Health Care Hedged to CAD Index ETF (ZUH $65.50)
-
State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust (SPY $720.65)
Q: Your portfolio review was helpful and appreciated. Am gradually tweaking our savings re diversification. Presently no healthcare. Am mulling a 3 - 5% (of equity) stake. We can do this in either Cdn or US$. The US healthcare sector is our preference. If we use our Cdn$, it appears you favour ZUH? Can you recommend an equivalent etf if we use our US$? I'm also hoping for your thoughts on whether now even the time to take a position in healthcare (given the current confusion down south) or would we be better off just to add this cash to our SPY or XSP. Thanks for your help.
Q: Do you have any crystal balling as to where the company is going after the FDA's decision on their new drug?
Q: Greetings 5i,
Enteromedics Inc - NASDAQ. Implanted pacemaker-like device that inhibits the nerve pathway from stomach to brain reducing sensations of hunger thus resulting in weight loss. With implants currently underway in many patients, can a case be made for taking a small Speculative position?
Cheers!
Enteromedics Inc - NASDAQ. Implanted pacemaker-like device that inhibits the nerve pathway from stomach to brain reducing sensations of hunger thus resulting in weight loss. With implants currently underway in many patients, can a case be made for taking a small Speculative position?
Cheers!
Q: I'm long CRH but I'm trying to consider all the negative outcomes that could take place. We are aware of the proposed code changes that will effect the reimbursement rate to CRH. But I keep hearing that private insurers will likely follow suit and cut back their reimbursement rate. If only the gov rate cut is factored into this big pull back could there possibly not be another big pull back if they cut back as well? I know CRH came out and stated what the hit to earnings would roughly be from GOV cuts but aren't the private insurers the majority of their income. Thanks
Q: between tso3 and theretechnologies if you had to pick one which would it be and why. dave
Q: good day to you all
would appreciate your updated opinion on Celg
thanks in advance
would appreciate your updated opinion on Celg
thanks in advance
Q: (Comment) Going forward I would expect that any acquisitions that are in CRH's pipeline may have just gotten a lot cheaper for them. Why pay up for CI when your share of the business is suddenly devalued ? Could CRH negotiate a different split on the revenue?
Clarence
Clarence
Q: If you were a holder of CRH, what would you do?
Q: July 19, 2017 ? asked by Darcy:
The answer indicated most selling was on the bid. How is this info calculated and where is it available?
The answer indicated most selling was on the bid. How is this info calculated and where is it available?
Q: Just a follow-up to the information I posted on Sunday: TDSI Action notes report yesterday, revised their target price from the $10 to $5.50 and calling the stock a HOLD. The analyst (only one) states that the 00740 and 00810 codes are being broken into 5 separate codes. "Although the changes include a mixture of rate cuts and increases, we believe the net effect could be an 8.5% reduction in CRH's realized rates."
"The underlying ASSUMPTION is that the proposed rules are implemented as is on January 1 2018".
He also believes the changes will hamper CRH's M&A activity.
Let's hope this analyst ( Lennox Gibbs) has decided to be ultra conservative after being comfortable on Friday.
Clarence
"The underlying ASSUMPTION is that the proposed rules are implemented as is on January 1 2018".
He also believes the changes will hamper CRH's M&A activity.
Let's hope this analyst ( Lennox Gibbs) has decided to be ultra conservative after being comfortable on Friday.
Clarence
Q: Hi Peter and team, I have some PLI and I am interested in other Canadian companies that are in late stage drug development. Are you able to suggest a few companies that have some potential? I realize this is a risky area. Thanks.
Q: Hi 5i, what's the book value per share of CRH? Thanks very much.
Q: What is your oversell level?
I feel there s money to be made in this name.
I feel there s money to be made in this name.
Q: I would have thought that the news release by the company would have stabalized the decline, but it has not. Any idea why the continued selling? Can you tell if the selling is retail or institution?
cheers
cheers
Q: I have a question about GUD. I HAVE BEEN TRYING TO BE PATIENT ON THIS NAME.iT SEEMS ALMOST TOO LONG .aNY SENSE OF HOW ONE CAN KEEP A PROPER PERSPECTIVE...WHEN ARE THEY GOING TO DO SOMETHING?
Q: Lost 54% of CRH investments since starting 3 months ago. Do you suggest to claim my losses or stay in. Where do you think this is going?
Q: hi folks:
I am curious as to your understanding of the passage below
(excerpted from stockhouse BB's)
is there a better than even chance that CRH is yet another company being brought to earth by 'creative' accounting or is everything simply been overblown?
thanks in advance
CRH'S CONFUSING ACCOUNTING? Help needed to understand this.
CRH has a unique acquisition model in that the company tends to purchase portions of businesses (typically 51%, sometimes more), recording 100% of the acquired business revenues and earnings on its consolidated financial statements with adjustments made for specific amounts attributable to shareholders and attributable to non-controlling interests. This acquisition practice, while compliant with GAAP and sound from an accounting standpoint, requires that investors pay more attention to the details within the company's financials to get a complete picture of what is going on.
The company's most recent financial statements show a quarterly net and comprehensive income increase of 9% year over year from $3.03 million in Q1 2016 to $3.3 million in Q1 2017. The breakdown of these earnings is where investors need to pay attention.
In Q1 2016, CRH reported that net income attributable to shareholders was $2.96 million (or 97.7% of total earnings).
In Q1 2017, CRH reported that net income attributable to shareholders was $1.54 million (or only 46.7% of total earnings).
Because of the company's acquisition model, stock-based compensation, and increases in finance-related costs, CRH is now paying out more than half of its earnings to non-controlling interests. This is a trend which has been ongoing for the past year with the shareholders portion of earnings consistently declining over time.
Looking at earnings per share (EPS), we can see that earnings have significantly underperformed expectations ($0.02 EPS attributable to shareholders compared to $0.07 EPS expected.
Consider this note from the most recent financial statements: The company has also stated its intention to acquire or develop additional GI anesthesia businesses. In the future, it may be necessary for the Company to raise additional funds for the continuing development of its business plan, including additional acquisitions.
Insiders selling large amounts of stock of late CRH directors David Johnson and Edward Wright sold a combined $5.71 million of stock at average prices between $7.45 and $11.05 in March, which amounts to nearly 1% of CRHs total float. As I have reported previously, insider selling is generally not an issue in large and very liquid equities with compensation structures reliant on stock options. In growth-related businesses, large stock option redemptions can be commonplace and may largely be ignored by the financial markets for those reasons. That said, any time nearly 1% of a company's stock is sold by insiders, questions undoubtedly come to mind.
Bottom line I am skeptical about CRHs growth strategy from the standpoint of a shareholder. It appears to me that the substantial dilution effect resulting from this growth strategy is one which will not benefit shareholders in the long run. My skepticism also extends to the recent large liquidation of stock by two company directors, making me more uneasy about this company's long-term prospects.
I am curious as to your understanding of the passage below
(excerpted from stockhouse BB's)
is there a better than even chance that CRH is yet another company being brought to earth by 'creative' accounting or is everything simply been overblown?
thanks in advance
CRH'S CONFUSING ACCOUNTING? Help needed to understand this.
CRH has a unique acquisition model in that the company tends to purchase portions of businesses (typically 51%, sometimes more), recording 100% of the acquired business revenues and earnings on its consolidated financial statements with adjustments made for specific amounts attributable to shareholders and attributable to non-controlling interests. This acquisition practice, while compliant with GAAP and sound from an accounting standpoint, requires that investors pay more attention to the details within the company's financials to get a complete picture of what is going on.
The company's most recent financial statements show a quarterly net and comprehensive income increase of 9% year over year from $3.03 million in Q1 2016 to $3.3 million in Q1 2017. The breakdown of these earnings is where investors need to pay attention.
In Q1 2016, CRH reported that net income attributable to shareholders was $2.96 million (or 97.7% of total earnings).
In Q1 2017, CRH reported that net income attributable to shareholders was $1.54 million (or only 46.7% of total earnings).
Because of the company's acquisition model, stock-based compensation, and increases in finance-related costs, CRH is now paying out more than half of its earnings to non-controlling interests. This is a trend which has been ongoing for the past year with the shareholders portion of earnings consistently declining over time.
Looking at earnings per share (EPS), we can see that earnings have significantly underperformed expectations ($0.02 EPS attributable to shareholders compared to $0.07 EPS expected.
Consider this note from the most recent financial statements: The company has also stated its intention to acquire or develop additional GI anesthesia businesses. In the future, it may be necessary for the Company to raise additional funds for the continuing development of its business plan, including additional acquisitions.
Insiders selling large amounts of stock of late CRH directors David Johnson and Edward Wright sold a combined $5.71 million of stock at average prices between $7.45 and $11.05 in March, which amounts to nearly 1% of CRHs total float. As I have reported previously, insider selling is generally not an issue in large and very liquid equities with compensation structures reliant on stock options. In growth-related businesses, large stock option redemptions can be commonplace and may largely be ignored by the financial markets for those reasons. That said, any time nearly 1% of a company's stock is sold by insiders, questions undoubtedly come to mind.
Bottom line I am skeptical about CRHs growth strategy from the standpoint of a shareholder. It appears to me that the substantial dilution effect resulting from this growth strategy is one which will not benefit shareholders in the long run. My skepticism also extends to the recent large liquidation of stock by two company directors, making me more uneasy about this company's long-term prospects.
Q: In answer to Febin's question on Friday you said that "The stock reaction (crh) is likely appropriate, though, putting its risk/reward in line: thus we would do nothing here". How did you determine the risk/reward of Crh? What metrics/rational did you apply? I'm currently down 48% on a 1/2 position and appreciate your response. Thankyou.