skip to content
  1. Home
  2. >
  3. Questions
  4. >
  5. CAR.UN: One year ago I decided to choose 6 reits ( avoiding shopping centers and offices),+ one professionaly managed reit etf (mentionned above) . [Canadian Apartment Properties Real Estate Investment Trust]
You can view 2 more answers this month. Sign up for a free trial for unlimited access.

Investment Q&A

Not investment advice or solicitation to buy/sell securities. Do your own due diligence and/or consult an advisor.

Q: One year ago I decided to choose 6 reits ( avoiding shopping centers and offices),+ one professionaly managed reit etf (mentionned above) .The final result is that the managed ETF did loose 15% +,and the 6 "amateur chosen" ETF gained more than 15% ,the choice was based on the "basic observation"of a slowing economy and specific individual REIT performances,I did then favour industrial, data centers and some real estate REITs.Is it normal that a professionaly managed ETF could underperform so much versus personal choices and why? I wonder if I should trust actively managed products on the future,considering the fees etc..,instead of just choosing stocks or ETFs in safe sectors according to observable macro-economic tendancies.
Asked by Jean-Yves on September 12, 2023
5i Research Answer:

We would not say it is typical to see such a 'miss' but can offer some comments. MREL has a high MER of 1.28%. Over time, this will certainly add up versus 0% for a do-it-yourself portfolio. MREL does not follow a specific index, but it is gauged against one (S&P/TSX Capped REIT Index). Most fund managers do not like to stray away from their benchmark much (this is called index hugging). Thus, they tend to only outperfrom or underperform their index by a small margin. Because the index includes all sorts of REITs, including retail and office, this has likely been a big drag on performance. In addition to index hugging, it is also possible the fund manager's boss actively encouraged them to have more diversification. Again, owning the underperforming subsectors then would have negatively impacted performance. Looking at MREL's holdings, there are some shopping/office REITs, but not really in a significant amount. We would not beat up all active managers based on this one observation. But...a carefully chosen concentrated portfolio will still outperform most managers. The issue of course is that high concentration amplifies losses if one is 'wrong'. MREL owns 41 different securities, so a portfolio of only 6 will always move (up and down) 'more'.