Q: Can I please have your candid and honest opinion on the following which I came across recently
"Concordia Healthcare Corp. has essentially been forced to turn its entire business model on its head, according to a Bay Street analyst.
Up until September, the Oakville, Ont.-based pharmaceuticals company built its business by making a series of acquisitions that bumped up profit and revenue – in much the same way Valeant Pharmaceuticals International Inc. did. That formerly successful strategy is now in serious doubt.
“The re-valuing of the sector, coupled with Concordia’s substantial debt load, probably means the end of its financial arbitrage as a means to continue its non-organic [growth] for the foreseeable future” Doug Cooper, an analyst with Beacon Securities, wrote in a recent note to clients.
Concordia’s heavy debt burden stems from its recently completed $2.1-billion (U.S.) acquisition of Amdipharm Mercury Co. Ltd. (AMCo). Concordia was forced to fund a higher portion of the acquisition than planned with debt as opposed to equity. Only $520-million came from an equity increase. The firm had the rotten luck of conducting an equity financing smack in the middle of a stock market storm in the pharma sector. In an interview with The Globe and Mail last month, Mark Thompson, chief executive officer of Concordia, confirmed that the firm didn’t raise as much equity as it had hoped and was forced to make up the shortfall with debt.
“This [heavy debt load] has forced the company to change its strategy from a ‘growth-through-acquisition’ story to purely an internal growth story, driven by the new product launches at AMCo. ... With no imminent acquisition catalysts, we believe the shares will be range bound.”
Mr. Thompson told The Globe that the only acquisitions the firm will consider for the foreseeable future will be small, so called “tuck-in” acquisitions."
I have a current 6% position and considering some tax loss strategy. I reviewed you blog posting
Thanks
"Concordia Healthcare Corp. has essentially been forced to turn its entire business model on its head, according to a Bay Street analyst.
Up until September, the Oakville, Ont.-based pharmaceuticals company built its business by making a series of acquisitions that bumped up profit and revenue – in much the same way Valeant Pharmaceuticals International Inc. did. That formerly successful strategy is now in serious doubt.
“The re-valuing of the sector, coupled with Concordia’s substantial debt load, probably means the end of its financial arbitrage as a means to continue its non-organic [growth] for the foreseeable future” Doug Cooper, an analyst with Beacon Securities, wrote in a recent note to clients.
Concordia’s heavy debt burden stems from its recently completed $2.1-billion (U.S.) acquisition of Amdipharm Mercury Co. Ltd. (AMCo). Concordia was forced to fund a higher portion of the acquisition than planned with debt as opposed to equity. Only $520-million came from an equity increase. The firm had the rotten luck of conducting an equity financing smack in the middle of a stock market storm in the pharma sector. In an interview with The Globe and Mail last month, Mark Thompson, chief executive officer of Concordia, confirmed that the firm didn’t raise as much equity as it had hoped and was forced to make up the shortfall with debt.
“This [heavy debt load] has forced the company to change its strategy from a ‘growth-through-acquisition’ story to purely an internal growth story, driven by the new product launches at AMCo. ... With no imminent acquisition catalysts, we believe the shares will be range bound.”
Mr. Thompson told The Globe that the only acquisitions the firm will consider for the foreseeable future will be small, so called “tuck-in” acquisitions."
I have a current 6% position and considering some tax loss strategy. I reviewed you blog posting
Thanks
