Q: Never heard of EIT.UN until I saw question here the other day so I had a look at it. As well as looking at previous 5I questions and answers. What 5I doesn't like appears to be the fees and 20% weigthing in energy. Looking at it this is what I see.
1} Over the past five years trading between ten and thirteen dollars. Currently trading at the lower end. I assume because of oil and gas stocks being hammered. Though there is always the possiblity of going lower I have to think that sector is near bottom.... I have no representation in oil and gas so whatever percentage of " energy " they have in oil and gas as 20% of a 4% position in EIT.UN doesn't seem unreasonable.
2} If I were to insert EIT.UN in 5I's income portfolio I would in comparison classify it as lower risk, lower volatility, and higher yield than many in there. So assessing it from a risk point of view doesn't seem any more than other securities in there.
As a covered call ETF I realize up or down swings may be capped. But what I see is the bottom end of the trading range nearby { maybe nine bucks if things go for a tumble setting aside a 2008 2009 scenario where it was somewhere around 7 dollars } and the upside if lucky maybe twelve or thirteen dollars. That seems low risk for an 11.5% yield.....
Please comment on my reasoning ? I trust 5I's opinion way more than mine....Also what are the fees ? On their site they list three numbers ranging from 1% to 2.8%.... And would a 4% weighting be appropriate in a moderately conservative portfolio that is comfortable keeping the odd high yielder in there ?.......Thanks for your great work and advice.
1} Over the past five years trading between ten and thirteen dollars. Currently trading at the lower end. I assume because of oil and gas stocks being hammered. Though there is always the possiblity of going lower I have to think that sector is near bottom.... I have no representation in oil and gas so whatever percentage of " energy " they have in oil and gas as 20% of a 4% position in EIT.UN doesn't seem unreasonable.
2} If I were to insert EIT.UN in 5I's income portfolio I would in comparison classify it as lower risk, lower volatility, and higher yield than many in there. So assessing it from a risk point of view doesn't seem any more than other securities in there.
As a covered call ETF I realize up or down swings may be capped. But what I see is the bottom end of the trading range nearby { maybe nine bucks if things go for a tumble setting aside a 2008 2009 scenario where it was somewhere around 7 dollars } and the upside if lucky maybe twelve or thirteen dollars. That seems low risk for an 11.5% yield.....
Please comment on my reasoning ? I trust 5I's opinion way more than mine....Also what are the fees ? On their site they list three numbers ranging from 1% to 2.8%.... And would a 4% weighting be appropriate in a moderately conservative portfolio that is comfortable keeping the odd high yielder in there ?.......Thanks for your great work and advice.
