skip to content
  1. Home
  2. >
  3. Investment Q&A
You can view 3 more answers this month. Sign up for a free trial for unlimited access.

Investment Q&A

Not investment advice or solicitation to buy/sell securities. Do your own due diligence and/or consult an advisor.

Q: Dear 5i
For two seniors retiring soon with an anticipated retirement income of $75-$80k , what would be the ideal sources/ types of income coming from her RRSP , his RRSP and her spousal RRSP ?
1- 100% from capital gains and or return on capital or
2-100% from dividend income or
3-Somewhere in between ,
with the view of minimizing tax consequences.
Obviously there will to some interest income which I'm aware is least desireable .
I`m figuring that the end result for sources of income is reflective of the balance of fixed income vs equity in the portfolio ie risk profile each person or couple is willing to accept or live with . In essence i think i`ve answered my own question but would welcome your input anyways .
Also any income or capital gains achieved from a TFSA would be the most favourable due to no tax consequences correct ?
Thanks once again .
Bill C.




Read Answer Asked by Bill on June 25, 2018
Q: Hi

I have noticed that most publicly traded companies do not publish a separate fourth quarter report . Why is that ?

I would like to know if by subtracting every line of the annual report from the first, second and third quarter statement of the income, balance sheet and cash flow, an investor can derive the fourth quarter statements?

Could you list the lines which are not suited to this exercise?
Read Answer Asked by Gilles on June 25, 2018
Q: More of a portfolio construction question, I would really appreciate your opinion on the following. Whether in The Post or The Globe, more and more, I’m reading in the ‘personal financial profiles’ that individual investors should be allocating, in some cases up to 30% of their portfolios, to alternative investments. These typically include private company debt, individual mortgages, and ever-increasingly now, factoring, the assuming of small business’ accounts receivables.

I’m a conservative investor, close to retirement, no pension, planning to live off the income of my portfolio. Without over-reaching for yield, I invest in mostly blue chip big-cap, reasonably diversified, with an allocation to some of your growthier names. But when I look at what is increasingly being suggested by planners, always under the auspices that alternatives are safer because they cannot be marked to the market in times of corrections, I cannot comprehend it. Companies that cannot qualify for the better rates that banks offer, people who don’t qualify for bank mortgages, and companies who have to sell their receivables because they cannot wait to collect them on their own, sound very high risk to me, worlds higher than investing in a mix of banks, lifecos, utilities, pipelines, industrials, tech, health, reits, preferreds, fixed income, and the like. While the market values of what I typically invest in can tank during correction periods, in my mind, they certainly don’t carry the very high risk of permanent capital loss that these so-called alternatives do. Particularly so since most of the ‘alternatives’ I assume are small companies.

Are these being offered because, a) you require a broker to get them for you, hence you must use one and pay fees, and your accounts likely become stickier because of it, and b) so a broker, when in a correction period, can point to these and say they’re safer because they’re not reacting to the negativity — but only because in truth, there is no market to mark them against. Not until you try to sell, that is.

Long question, but am I missing the bigger picture, and these ‘alternatives’ are something that should be considered?
Read Answer Asked by Warren on June 25, 2018
Q: In Joel Greenblatts book "You can be a stock market genius" he mentions that spin-offs historically have been great investments. Obviously not all of them but a high number of them. Specifically they were most successful when key executives from the original company would be moving to the spin off company and leading it, and most specifically when those key executives had large incentives (options, shares, etc) if the spin off company was successful. Also there was a large amount of insider buying from these execs, specifically the CEO, CFO, etc. One example was one of John Malone's spin offs which to this day is seen as one of the most profitable in history. Anyway, what are your thoughts on this theory. Does the theory rain true in some of the spin offs we have seen like (ECN/EFN), (Bombardier/DOO). Thanks!
Read Answer Asked by Adam on June 21, 2018
Q: Hi, Bloomberg has just reported of Trump administration announcing US$50 Billion worth of tariffs on Chinese goods, effective Today. Some reports mention the figure as US$100 Billion. It is also widely expected that China will retaliate with tariffs on US products. What are the Canadian companies in 5i universe, which may be adversely impacted in terms of their business, due to this looming trade war. This could be due to their production facilities located in US or China or caused by a large part of their business between the two countries or any other side effects. Also, in your view, should this be a reason of concern from investment perspective ? Thanks
Read Answer Asked by rajeev on June 18, 2018
Q: Good Morning Team,

Just wanted to confirm the following:

- Capital gains on a US or Canadian stock held in an RRSP and TFSA are not taxed either by Canada or the US
- Capital gains on a US or Canadian stock held in a non-registered (RRSP) account are taxed
by Canada only.
- Dividends on a US stock held in a non-registered (RRSP) account are taxed both by Canada and the US.

Thank you for your confirmation or corrections!
Read Answer Asked by Saeed on June 15, 2018
Q: Hi there, I watched an interview this evening with David Rosenberg who was predicting a recession in 2019. My first question is what is your thoughts on this and do you agree with his perspective and second - while I know you are not in favour of timing the market, how would you approach/adjust your portfolio if you believe we were heading into a recession? For a person no fixed income portion, would you stay 100% invested in equities or move into a partial cash position - if so, how much cash? This bull market seems like its in extended innings, however the economy seems to be doing well overall and earnings seem strong. What do you think the best approach for ones portfolio heading into the 2019 or 2020?

Thanks!
Read Answer Asked by Michael on June 11, 2018
Looking for more? Sign up for a FREE 14 day trial! No credit card required

We invite you to sign up for a 14 day free trial of 5i Research!
Experience all the benefits and tools we have to offer; stock research, model portfolios, Q&A with our experts, and so much more. Join a community of like-minded investors today!