-
Mulvihill Canadian Bank Enhanced Yield ETF (CBNK $9.26)
- $9.26 P/E (TTM): 7.81X Cap: $123M
- View CBNK Profile
- View Questions on CBNK
Detailed Quote
Questions on this company?
Become a Member
Company Profile
{tplLang.businessdescription | toLang tLang}
{ profileData.description }
{tplLang.details | toLang tLang}
{tplLang.ceo | toLang tLang}
{profileData.profile.details.ceo}
{tplLang.employees | toLang tLang}
{profileData.profile.details.employees | numeraljs '0,0'}
{tplLang.issuetype | toLang tLang}
{profileData.profile.details.issuetype | asIssueType}
{tplLang.industryclassifications | toLang tLang}
{tplLang.sector | toLang tLang}
{profileData.profile.classification.sector}
{tplLang.industry | toLang tLang}
{profileData.profile.classification.industry}
{tplLang.toolname| toLang tLang}
There is no {tplLang.toolname| toLang tLang} currently available for
{data.symbolstring}.
Interactive Chart
Key Ratios
Earnings
Analyst Recommendations
5i Recent Questions
-
Mulvihill Canadian Bank Enhanced Yield ETF (CBNK $9.26)
- $9.26 P/E (TTM): 7.81X Cap: $123M
- View CBNK Profile
- View Questions on CBNK
-
Hamilton Canadian Financials YIELD MAXIMIZER TM ETF (HMAX $14.77)
- $14.77 P/E (TTM): 12.35X Cap: $804M
- View HMAX Profile
- View Questions on HMAX
Q: Please give me your opinion about this AND an alternative Bank ETF. Thanks!
-
Dividend 15 Split Corp. Class A Shares (DFN $6.46)
- $6.46 P/E (TTM): 16.58X Cap: $775M
- View DFN Profile
- View Questions on DFN
-
Canoe EIT Income Fund (EIT.UN $15.63)
- $15.63 P/E (TTM): 19.57X Cap: $2.47B
- View EIT.UN Profile
- View Questions on EIT.UN
-
Mulvihill Canadian Bank Enhanced Yield ETF (CBNK $9.26)
- $9.26 P/E (TTM): 7.81X Cap: $123M
- View CBNK Profile
- View Questions on CBNK
Q: Hello Peter and staff:
Each of the above mentioned have incredible yields, that pay monthly dividends - CBNK - 9.78%, EIT.UN - 8.74%, DFN - 22.94%. Could you comment on each of the 3 in terms of sustainability and could you rate them in order of preference, or not at all. Could you also recommend other high yield monthly dividend paying stocks. Thank you all for your incredible service.
Each of the above mentioned have incredible yields, that pay monthly dividends - CBNK - 9.78%, EIT.UN - 8.74%, DFN - 22.94%. Could you comment on each of the 3 in terms of sustainability and could you rate them in order of preference, or not at all. Could you also recommend other high yield monthly dividend paying stocks. Thank you all for your incredible service.
-
BMO Covered Call Canadian Banks ETF (ZWB $21.16)
- $21.16 P/E (TTM): 12.51X
- View ZWB Profile
- View Questions on ZWB
-
Premium Income Corporation Class A Shares (PIC.A $6.53)
- $6.53 P/E (TTM): 11.65X Cap: $103M
- View PIC.A Profile
- View Questions on PIC.A
-
Evolve Canadian Banks and Lifecos Enhanced Yield Index Fund (BANK $8.22)
- $8.22 P/E (TTM): 15.7X Cap: $180M
- View BANK Profile
- View Questions on BANK
-
Hamilton Enhanced Canadian Bank ETF (HCAL $28.08)
- $28.08 P/E (TTM): 12.51X Cap: $708M
- View HCAL Profile
- View Questions on HCAL
-
Hamilton Enhanced Canadian Financials ETF (HFIN $21.92)
- $21.92 P/E (TTM): 18.65X Cap: $174M
- View HFIN Profile
- View Questions on HFIN
-
Mulvihill Canadian Bank Enhanced Yield ETF (CBNK $9.26)
- $9.26 P/E (TTM): 7.81X Cap: $123M
- View CBNK Profile
- View Questions on CBNK
Q: Is there some way to score-board enhanced-yield Canadian bank ETFs/funds that assigns more weight to the factors that make more of a difference? Yes, fees add up, but even over the long term it's hard to see how basis-point fee differences could outweigh percentage-point yield differences. And won't either of these factors be outweighed by distribution tax treatment and, especially, by central bank rate-pivoting?
Further, in side-by-side comparisons, 5i often prefers larger ETFs (recently, for example, when comparing CBNK vs BANK.) But given large-cap banks' similar value-propositions and tendency toward mean-reversion, why should higher AUM matter (other than w/rt second-order effects like trading liquidity)? Put another way: what, if anything, could a new entrant to this sector do to make themselves attractive to 5i?
Please add to the supplied symbol list if other names provide more instructive comparisons.
Further, in side-by-side comparisons, 5i often prefers larger ETFs (recently, for example, when comparing CBNK vs BANK.) But given large-cap banks' similar value-propositions and tendency toward mean-reversion, why should higher AUM matter (other than w/rt second-order effects like trading liquidity)? Put another way: what, if anything, could a new entrant to this sector do to make themselves attractive to 5i?
Please add to the supplied symbol list if other names provide more instructive comparisons.
Insiders
Share Information
News and Media