skip to content
Detailed Quote
Questions on this company?
Become a Member
Company Profile
{tplLang.businessdescription | toLang tLang}
{ profileData.description }

{tplLang.details | toLang tLang}

{tplLang.ceo | toLang tLang}
{profileData.profile.details.ceo}
{tplLang.employees | toLang tLang}
{profileData.profile.details.employees | numeraljs '0,0'}
{tplLang.issuetype | toLang tLang}
{profileData.profile.details.issuetype | asIssueType}

{tplLang.industryclassifications | toLang tLang}

{tplLang.sector | toLang tLang}
{profileData.profile.classification.sector}
{tplLang.industry | toLang tLang}
{profileData.profile.classification.industry}

{tplLang.toolname| toLang tLang}

There is no {tplLang.toolname| toLang tLang} currently available for {data.symbolstring}.
Interactive Chart
Key Ratios
Earnings
Analyst Recommendations
5i Recent Questions
Q: I have 2 American Equity mutual funds: BTG105 and MAW108 in an RRSP. I also own the ETF VFV. Performance wise BTG105 has lagged MAW108 and VFV in the last 6 months, 1 yr, 3 yr, 5yr, and 10 yr periods, so I will sell it. But should I replace it with MAW108 or VFV?

MAW108 appears to have outperformed VFV in the last 3 yr, 5yr and 10 yr periods, while VFV outperformed MAW108 in the last 1 yr.

Can you rank these 3, best to worst?

Would you replace BTG105 and MAW108 with VFV (and consolidate all 3 into 1), or keep both MAW108 and VFV for US equity exposure?

Thanks,
Paul
Read Answer Asked by Paul on August 10, 2021
Insiders
Share Information
News and Media